this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
979 points (100.0% liked)

196

16442 readers
1529 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 5 months ago (15 children)

Comment sections like this make me feel like I'm in a room full of crazy people, and or I eventually start to question my own sanity.

I mean sure, a spectrum is defined by at least 2 most extreme points (depending on the amount of dimensions). But like, what's stopping us form mapping two or more people to either extreme? Why can't 2 people be equally most gay or equally least gay?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think that could be possible. If sexuality were multi-dimensional and "gayness" was just a 1-D collapse of a higher dimensional space then you could pick a vector in the higher dimensional space to represent gayness, such that a few points at the extreme happen to have the same dot-product with that vector.

But then you would be defining gayness around the gymnastics of setting that up instead of something you are actually trying to estimate about people on that spectrum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (10 children)

If you limit the resolution of the gayness measurement, sure. You could define least gay as 0 and most gay as 5, then you have millions of people on 5. But there are infinitely many real numbers, and if there were some theoretical 100% accurate way to measure "gayness" (whatever that means) at "infinite resolution", the chance of two people being equally most gay is theoretically 0. On the other hand of the spectrum, it'd be impossible to be ENTIRELY not gay at all, so even if millions of people are very close to 0, one would be the closest.

I'm way overthinking this lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not only that. What if there are multiple aspects to what gay defines. Is it just how much they like the same sex, or also how many fake stories they post online? One can score a 5 on one, and a 4 on the other.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Or a total preorder

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Since the real numbers are a spectrum there exists one number which is the largest

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not comparable. There are finite gay people but infinite real numbers

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

You have ignored the possibility that even though there are finite gay people, among those finite gays one of them might be infini-gay.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Found him again

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There's still gay people on Xitter? Why? It's full of Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's 8 billion people. I'm pretty sure gay nazis exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

plenty of gay furry artists around on that platform making lots of gay furry porn

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Every large social platform has groups of people who hate each other, even lemmy. They just all have ways to keep only showing people the posts from groups they support (through defederation and only looking at specific communities, or twitter/youtube/tiktok/facebook's algorithms, etc)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

There can be only one!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

I thought Smith won most gay?

"Being gay isn't a choice, it's a competition. And I'm winning."

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›