this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
552 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

34889 readers
464 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 115 points 5 months ago (8 children)

It's honestly impressive to find out that someone is WORSE than Apple when it comes to repairing and customer rights.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 132 points 5 months ago

The use of aftermarket parts in repair is relatively common. This provision requires independent repair shops to destroy the devices of their own customers, and then to snitch on them to Samsung. 

That's just pure evil and bully. If you have aftermarket parts they will destroy the device and force you to pay for it. This is the reason we need right to repair. Every consumer should support it.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Apple: bricks phone with unapproved part. Samsung: “hold my beer”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"...prohibits repair stores from repairing components on the mainboard. Instead, the entire component must be replaced..."

A flagrant disregard for the costs of e-waste on the environment. What a surprise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 253 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Even more dramatic is that if a repair service provider discovers a third-party spare part that was installed in a Galaxy device as part of a previous repair, they must immediately disassemble the smartphone, tablet or notebook into its individual parts and inform Samsung of the details of the respective incident.

Well this feels illegal (or certainly should be). Imagine taking your car in for a repair only to find out the shop functionally scrapped it and told on you to Ford, all because they noticed you had changed a tire.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“You used a non-Ford approved part. For your safety, we have disassembled your vehicle and reported you to the consumer protection police. You have lost your license and the full balance of your loan/lease is due in 24 hours.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 128 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Funny you mentioned that. I was out with my daughter a couple days ago and she got a flat that had to be replaced. She was legitimately worried that Toyota would void her warranty for not buying a tire from the dealership. Nevermind that we were out in rural nothingness with no Toyota dealership to be found.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 5 months ago

Honestly, that's pretty close to what could've been if the Right to Repair act for cars didn't pass back when it did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 145 points 5 months ago (2 children)

God bless iFixit, and God damn Samsung.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›