this post was submitted on 21 May 2024

200 points (99.0% liked)

News

23296 readers

3197 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

200

US says cyberattacks against water supplies are rising, and utilities need to do more to stop them (apnews.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cyberattacks against water utilities across the country are becoming more frequent and more severe, the Environmental Protection Agency warned Monday as it issued an enforcement alert urging water systems to take immediate actions to protect the nation’s drinking water.

About 70% of utilities inspected by federal officials over the last year violated standards meant to prevent breaches or other intrusions, the agency said. Officials urged even small water systems to improve protections against hacks. Recent cyberattacks by groups affiliated with Russia and Iran have targeted smaller communities.

Some water systems are falling short in basic ways, the alert said, including failure to change default passwords or cut off system access to former employees. Because water utilities often rely on computer software to operate treatment plants and distribution systems, protecting information technology and process controls is crucial, the EPA said. Possible impacts of cyberattacks include interruptions to water treatment and storage; damage to pumps and valves; and alteration of chemical levels to hazardous amounts, the agency said.

…

McCabe named China, Russia and Iran as the countries that are “actively seeking the capability to disable U.S. critical infrastructure, including water and wastewater.”

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The EPA has faced setbacks. States periodically review the performance of water providers. In March 2023, the EPA instructed states to add cybersecurity evaluations to those reviews. If they found problems, the state was supposed to force improvements.

But Missouri, Arkansas and Iowa, joined by the American Water Works Association and another water industry group, challenged the instructions in court on the grounds that EPA didn’t have the authority under the Safe Drinking Water Act. After a court setback, the EPA withdrew its requirements but urged states to take voluntary actions anyway.

The Safe Drinking Water Act requires certain water providers to develop plans for some threats and certify they’ve done so. But its power is limited.

"I don't need a safety on a gun! Safety is for sissies! ......[incident]..... Gah, I just blew my fucking foot off! Why didn't anybody WARN me of the danger, this is all the goverment's fault!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Congress needs to enact something with teeth so the government can enforce netsec on important commercial infrastructure.

They also need to be forced to be transparent about breaches (at least to the go).

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why are any of them not air gapped?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I can pay my bill online. That means there is a connection between the systems. They need to add up all the water everyone in my neighborhood uses compared to how much they pumped into my neighborhood - if there is a difference there is a leak someplace. While each link only needs to be connected to the next, eventually there is a system that is connected to the internet, and so the whole cannot be air gaped. Not to mention the internet is a really easy place to connect everything to.

Also, it is really nice if you work at the utility to be able to control the pumps and valved scattered all over the city without having to physically go to each one. Or better yet automatic control - which is only possible if all the systems are connected - see above about one of those systems leading to my bill and so must be connected.

Air gap is useful for a few military systems. Everything else (including most military systems) are better off networked. However we do need to protect the network better.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They did all that before the internet. I'm not sure why the internet is necessary now.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

They did - but it was a lot more work - (and often mistakes were made) and that means costs were higher. Or more likely they didn't do the work as often and so it was a lot longer before they discovered problems.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We could do that... or we could raise rates again for the third time this month and record another year of record profits. After much consideration, we'll do the latter, but you better be ready to bail us out if we get hacked.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Water and sewer are overwhelmingly public utilities in the US. This is more a case of small-time bureaucratic incompetence than corporate avarice -- think along the lines of your grandpa writing the default Wifi password on the front of the router because he can't remember it and doesn't know how to change it, except Grandpa is in charge of a rural water district, and the router is the control system for the chlorine treatment.

Where water service is expensive in the US it's usually because decades-old infrastructure built to support far-flung suburban development are starting to fall apart, and there was never a plan to pay for replacement. Some places are also being required by the EPA to separate ancient combined storm and sanitary sewers, which basically entails a complete replacement of the sewers at a cost of billions. Infrastructure is expensive to maintain, especially if you spend a few decades ignoring it first.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

And when the rural communities can't afford to do the EPA mandated updates, they sell out to a publicly traded, for profit corporation...who raises basic utility fees multiple times over the short span they've owned and operated the infrastructure of the rural communities.

I'm not saying you're wrong in every instance, as what you've said holds true a lot of the time. Just not in this very specific, albeit anecdotal, instance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

So there is also the classic issue of underfunding of municipal services. Good luck getting qualified security people for what local government pays.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So my "prepper" neighbor is on to something...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I can't tell you what I do, but if you saw the stupid shit my firm sees, you'd be a prepper too.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This sounds like the sort of thing I've heard preppers tell me for the almost 50 years I've been around.

And I'll repeat what I usually say: If society collapses to that point, I don't want to survive the aftermath. I have no Mad Max fantasies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Society will not collapse. If it does odds are you won't survive what caused the collapse in the first place. (if you are a prepper make sure your neighbors know how to access you stash - both so that it doesn't go to waste if you can't get to it and because even if you can get to it you will need whatever neighbors survive to rebuild society)

However there are a lot of disasters that are much more likely that society collapse that are worth being prepared for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As I said to the other person, that's not being a prepper. The whole idea behind being a prepper is that "The Big One" is coming.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Right, I'm saying the big one isn't coming - and even if it comes you won't survive so what is the point.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No need for societal collapse. Most of my tech friends in Austin have rain collection tanks and emergency generators now after the grid collapse. Same goes with an uncle that moved to Puerto Rico.

It doesn't take much (not much at all) to put you and your family in a position where you don't have safe drinking water.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Having some sort of off-grid water storage or access method is not being a prepper.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If having off-grid water and power backup, along with some long term storage consumables (freeze dried and canned food) isn't prepping, that what is your definition of prepping?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

How long do you expect to be without water and power and have to eat your own food?

Because the people I'm talking about are suggesting indefinitely. No thank you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What does your firm do and what do you see?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

We specialize in data and system optimizations for enterprise critical applications.

ProTip: Contest your electric bills. Most states allow you to do so and the utility company will have to provide your meter reading data to back up the bill.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Our water and electric data is collected from wireless readers. Are you saying they are not reporting accurately?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

I'm skirting really close to my NDA here but think about this. Imagine a city has ~3,000,000 active meters. Each meter polls every five minutes or so (more often if it is a gas meter). Legal retention is about seven years. Usage reports are due to market daily. Given that this is exclusively a cost, executives aren't keen on throwing buckets of money at it. So, in this "imaginary" scenario, what are the odds that things will go smoothly?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Is there any guarantee the utility company won't just drop you like a rock when they're fed up with contesting bills? (That is a serious question, most of us are locked in by utility monopolies so if that is a risk it would be borderline life ruining)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

No. Large commercial customers contest their bills constantly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They cannot legally do that in most areas. So long as you pay your actually bills they have to serve you. If you contest the bills and then never pay when the real bill is given they can disconnect you, but so long as you pay up they have to serve you. Where I live even if they disconnect you they have to reconnect you every winter.

Note that if you contest bills that are correct they can sue you. It isn't worth their time if it is just you (they would spend a million dollars in legal fees to get $1000), but if people start contesting legitimate bills they will start making examples of the loudest people. Pay your legitimate bills without complaint is the best advice here. Contest if they actually are wrong, this can happen, but it isn't common.

If you cannot pay your utility bills contact your utility - they are programs in place for the poor and they will guide you to them (they want their money, they don't care where it comes from)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Pay your legitimate bills without complaint is the best advice here. Contest if they actually are wrong, this can happen, but it isn't common.

And here lies the problem. It is actually very common. I know of one major utility company that has been "estimating" 70%+ of their residential bills for years. They cannot get a handle on it and they haven't had full, clean data for years...so how are they estimating? They aren't. They are guesstimates. That's why they hired us.

That's the most extreme case due to the sheer number of households, but most do it. We only have one customer that has hired us to help them achieve their goal of zero estimates. One. Most just want to reach "good enough for minimum regulatory compliance".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I would guess that in many (or even most) areas that don't have municipal utilities, the commercial utility is under no legal obligation to provide their service to you. Otherwise, they couldn't shut off people's electricity or water for non-payment.