this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
481 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

58123 readers
4330 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

"Businessmen favor free enterprise in general but are opposed to it when it comes to themselves." -- Milton Friedman

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

This is why he wants 25% of tesla so badly

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Free markets for me but not for thee

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (14 children)

This is how all capitalist markets progress, which is why I get annoyed when folks try to talk about this as though it is hypocritical. There is nothing hypocritical about a capitalist attempting to stifle innovation and competition for the advancement of their own personal wealth. This is what capitalism is about.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I agree that's it's a "hate the game, not the player". The issue is how much influence he could have to steer the market to favor his product vs. the competition. It's happened so many times in history where the better product fails because they can't play the game like the inferior company.

To quote "Pirates of Silicon Valley":

Steve Jobs: We're better than you are! We have better stuff.

Bill Gates: You don't get it, Steve. That doesn't matter!

So is it fair for the consumer for big companies to be able to influence the game itself and not just play within the same rules? I'd say no.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I don’t think you’re really addressing my comment, which is just a criticism of how folks write about these “hypocrisies.”

Of course it’s not fair; that’s the entire foundational pillar on which capitalism rests. I’m not saying “hate the game, not the player”. Rather I’m saying the game is bullshit and the player should have his balls kicked with steel toed boot repeatedly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Part of the free-market attitude though is that you should be allowed to buy policy, so in that regard it's consistent, you just have to account for corruption in the cost of doing business.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

'Mericuh fuck yeah!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›