I'm very happy with Syncthing, you can configure how you want the sync to work (e.g. one-way sync, two-way sync, etc.), the web GUI is pretty good and it's not that hard to set up. I got the idea from this video back when I initially set up my seedbox, have been using this solution ever since and encountered any issues.
Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
I've used it in the past, but they are deprecating one-way ignore-delete syncing.
Do you have a source for that? I’m using syncthing for this exact purpose.
An explanation from one of the maintainers explaining why they removed the toggle from the UI and try to hide it from users because it's going to be deprecated eventually:
Thanks! I didn't find this when searching. Guess I’ll be searching for another solution for my setup.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Rsync is what you're after, especially if you're moving large files. I regularly transfer hundreds of gb using rsync and it's great.
Rsync or Rclone.
My understanding of rsync was that it was pretty painfully slow.
The only time rsync is really slow is when your dealing with millions of small files since it only transfers a single file at a time.
rclone is better in that respect since it transfers multiple files in parallel. I don't think the speed of a single transfer is going to differ much.
That must have been it, appreciate the clarification.
I don't know if this applies to you, but don't use the compression flag (-z) for files that already is compressed (like video). The transfer will get CPU bound quickly if you have a fast internet connection.
I went from 13 Mbytes/s to 200 by removing the -z flag, and the compression ratio was non-existant anyway.
I use rsync for this purpose and the only notable bottleneck is my download speed, fwiw.