this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
242 points (92.3% liked)

News

23275 readers
3429 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

If I were Mitt I would immediately transfer everything I own to rockandsock.

It's really easy to say what you'd hypothetically do in someone else's place isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 105 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Well, not that we needed one, but I really appreciate you giving us a reminder for why we should never ever make you president, Mittens. It's very thoughtful of you.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago

Mitt Romney is an idiot

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Ah yes. Fewer consequences for the rich is what we need.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

All I did was post an article, you big meanie

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't there have to be a conviction in order for there to be a pardon? Or is that a myth?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Nixon got a full pardon and I don't think he was ever charged.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That's what I was going to say. Pretty sure it's true. I read something a while ago about people who had been pardoned, not realizing that it's an admission of guilt. I think a person can even turn down a pardon on that basis, but I'm not positive on that last part.

I guess Biden would have to say he WOULD pardon him, to head off any charges.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

None of that is true. Nixon was never charged, let alone convicted of any crimes. And pardons can be completely general and not even specify an explicit crime at all. President Ford's pardon of Nixon, for example, was for "all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974" So, no. Neither charges or convictions are required, nor even a crime at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I see, but the guilt IS still a thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What about the person declining the pardon part?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

Wow, this is an impressively stupid take.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't take the snivelling, manipulative, lying scumbag out of the republican, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

To be fair, he’s probably being too honest with this one

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago

Biden can't pardon state crimes.

[–] [email protected] 225 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Remember: no Republicans are arguing Trump didn't break the law.

They're arguing he shouldn't be punished for it.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They’re arguing he shouldn’t be punished for it

They are really arguing that all Republicans shouldn't be punished but if you aren't in the club you get the full blast of the law.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yea I think he has to be found guilty of the crime to be pardoned, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think you have to admit guilt? Which is bullshit because the purpose of a pardon isnt to get guilty people off but to act as a check against judicial power. I'm not sure though.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Nope.

A pardon stops all punishment from the judicial system. You don't have to plead guilty and criminal proceedings stop. A pardon further undoes any legal handicap (for example, you can own firearms again).

That said, if you accept a pardon you can't plead the fifth when it comes to details related to the crime you've committed.

There's also a commutation, which is weaker than a pardon. Instead of having the crime fully forgiven you are simply let out of jail with the understanding you committed the crime and must face follow up consequences (like not being able to own firearms).

Finally, there are also conditional pardons. Those are ones where the president could impose a "you must plead guilty" style rule before the pardon can be applied. He could also apply a rule that says "you must perform 10 jumping jacks".

Pardon powers are some of the most broad we have in the US.

About the only limitation is you can't pardon for future crimes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

About the only limitation is you can’t pardon for future crimes.

Yeah, you really want Roberts' SCOTUS to rule on that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Maybe, maybe not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago

No. Nixon was never charged, but he was pardoned.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago

And this guy is supposed to be the “moderate” GOP. Crooks and liars all the way down their bones.

[–] [email protected] 157 points 6 months ago

Ford was, based on the behavior of the Reagan, W Bush, and Trump administrations, entirely wrong to pardon Nixon. There is no reason to repeat his mistake.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I actually had an idea that Biden could pardon Trump, then Trump couldn't plead the 5th when called as a witness against anyone else. So he would have the choice of truthful answers or perjury.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Seeing how this current judge has been handling him with kid gloves I wouldn’t expect anything bad to happen to him even if he did perjure himself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Notice how he is minding every p and a, crossing every t and dotting every i?

That’s so that, when he’s done, there will be nothing to appeal.

They will still try, but try and achieve are so different they don’t even share a letter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 6 months ago

Maybe the ex-president shouldn't have been such a criminal, Mitt.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What? Anyway, that would never happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just when you thought he wasn't half bad.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

Anybody who thought that was half stupid.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And there ya go groveling to your orange master, Romney. What a spineless bitch.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›