this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

AssholeDesign

7417 readers
1 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And the label doesn't say anything about it, doesn't have the "don't throw in the trash" logo.

Those LEDs are glued in, there's no way to remove batteries before discarding the item

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Alkaline batteries can be safely disposed in household garbage.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

*it can be safely done yes, but but shouldn't and it's not allowed in some areas. Where I live everywhere that sells batteries has to have collection points for their recycling and it is not legal to put them in the trash.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Until stupid people stop buying this crap, this is always going to happen.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Why can we only ever hold the consumers liable? Why do people like you never condemn the creators and those who sell these products?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Because people buy them, they won't stop making them whilst they sell. Stop buying them and they'll stop making them. It's not like the are necessary.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Because sometimes the consumer is the boss.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Currently the only way to do that is to not buy dumb shit. What is condemning the manufacturers supposed to do? Make them shift uncomfortably on top of the pile of money?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but companies need to be start being responsible too. I want to see a tax added to every single electronic product that covers recycling.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

They’ll never be responsible on their own. They’d willingly give you cancer if they knew it was profitable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

It wasn't advertised. OP says the label didn't indicate this was there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

We’re also making disposable vapes that have rechargeable cells inside, just without any way to charge them,

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

On models without a charge port, some of the batteries aren't even flat when the pods are burnt out 🤷‍♂️

Worst i've read is around 3.8v under load, which is roughly 60% full... that would be a very destructive result compressed in the back of a garbage truck.

Been harvesting these so far but don't have enough projects to use them in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

I had a small bag of them for a year. I'll just dispose of it at this point. They're discharged so they likely lost quite a bit of capacity.

My dad used to use those. Better yet, from Wish.

And anyway, I have a similar bag of old 18650s to take care of. I should check their voltages now that I remembered it. I know their capacities used to be OK, but similar story. Haven't touched them for a while.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

most of them are rechargeable. not refillable though, so once out of juice it's trash time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There are so many sensible reasons to regulate these vapes and yet they go for protect the children.

How does banning disposable vapes which costs almost the same as cartridges for a non disposable vape help at all at protecting kids who would probably already stand out in the adult-oriented stores these are sold.

There needs to be proper quality control on these things with a set of ground rules for recycling and safe use. What does it matter if the user is 18 or 21?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They do it because "protect the children" is an easy sale, everyone falls in line because nobody wants to be against something "for the children". Also the reason why the horse gets beaten over every internet censorship attempt.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

"protect the children" is an easy sale until you want to actually do something to fix the leading causes of child deaths, like say road injuries..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Totally agree, first thing I did when reading that was facepalm - not a good rhetoric at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They should use the deposit system to ensure they are recycled properly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Even if they were all properly recycled, which isn't going to happen, this product still shouldn't be sold. We don't need any more consumables with large ecological impact. Recycling isn't doing nearly enough to balance out the damage.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As long as people keep buying this shit and the industry succeeds in calling this a consumer problem, nothing will change. The onus needs to be on the manufacturer and doing wasteful shit like this needs to cost them dearly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

You need political regulations for this type of shit. There's just way too many people who just don't care.