Irc: I ain't dead yet bitch! Discord is fucking awful for dev and search.
this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
668 points (99.4% liked)
Technology
59429 readers
3081 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Oh, look, it's Reddit all over again.
(Yes, yes, different reason. Same user response, though.)
Okay but why? It's not like it's personal Data or something. I don't get why people are mad ._.
EDIT: Ofcourse you can downvote me but I'd really like an answer, tho. The article is not very clear about this.
It gives worse answers and hallucinates a lot, problems specific to the model's design and not how much training data it gets. Even if it did work, it would be taking jobs away from actual programmers. It's a total net negative, users have nothing to benefit from this. Plus, since this is a community of programmers, they're all very much aware of these limitations and the lack of ethics of OpenAI.
Except from the “taking Jobs part” I can understand you, thank you :D
Because it's original work they contributed for free. Lending others that kind of expertise and time, just that it get's used by a machine learning algorithm, which aims to reproduce this, without giving it back to them or the community in a similar free manner, feels violating.
Apart from that, creators feel ownership over their content and it feels wrong not to be asked what happens to it. (Although those probably wouldn't – or shouldn't – use SO anyway, as their content gets commercialised anyway by giving it SO for free.)
I get the feelings, but once they added the content in SO, it was no longer their content.
it was no longer their content.
all posts were supposedly licensed under creative commons
Do they have the non-commercial/no-derivative clause?
Aaaaah okay that is somehting I can understand, thank you!
time for users to shred their comments and posts
If it’s free online, you are the product
Not necessarily, no. There are a plethora of non-profit services and pages on the net.
What platform do you think you used to write that commeent?
Regarding platforms of for-profit companies, you are more right than wrong though.
Oh I was referring to for profit. Should have specified. I’m used to using that when meta screws over their users.
Alright, I'll bite, what's the FOSS endgame?
Lately it's been companies using liberal licenses to build their product up really fast and then doing a rig pull bcz "oh no we can't have competition!".
But it's also from the user perspective... Freedom to not pay a lonely dev that's been coding on the project for "fun" or "for the community" for 15 years.
I love free software, but if y:all want it to succeed you need to support the devs!
It's time for a federated version. How about "OutOfMemory"? It would fit because I always return to the same topics on StackOverflow.
Stack Overflow, technically a neutral term. Idk though whether the name in such a context would violate any trademark laws even if it's a non-profit platform.
Snack Overflow
Nullpointer Exception
Access Violation
RubberDuckHaven
Syntax Error
Page Not Found
Random Access
Guru meditation
:D
Segmentation fault
And so the enshitification continues...
I bet its related to the continuous need to liquidate resources to support the proxy war effort. You can't print money withour offering some value.
view more: next ›