this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
412 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2592 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“We have to stop destroying the planet as we feed ourselves,” a World Bank official said, as red meat and dairy drive CO2 emissions.

Cows and milk are out, chicken and broccoli are in — if the World Bank has its way, that is.

In a new paper, the international financial lender suggests repurposing the billions rich countries spend to boost CO2-rich products like red meat and dairy for more climate-friendly options like poultry, fruits and vegetables. It's one of the most cost-effective ways to save the planet from climate change, the bank argues.

The politically touchy recommendation — sure to make certain conservatives and European countries apoplectic — is one of several suggestions the World Bank offers to cut climate-harming pollution from the agricultural and food sectors, which are responsible for nearly a third of global greenhouse gas emissions.

The paper comes at a diplomatically strategic moment, as countries signed on to the Paris Agreement — the global pact calling to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius — prepare to update their climate plans by late 2025.

(page 3) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Red meat for the rich, white meat for the poor.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago (16 children)

Honestly, it makes sense. Something's gotta give or we're all fucked. We should already be eating less red meat and dairy anyway since they're less healthy than white meat and milk alternatives - adding the economic incentive would be a push in the right direction to be healthier and more eco-friendly.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Meat and dairy should be way more expensive in general

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I cant wait for some conservative idiot to spin this in the worst possible way. Mixed in with some lies, whataubout-isms and straw-mans for a delicious disinformation-coktail!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Florida has already started the "they're coming for our meat" with the lab grown meat ban if you haven't seen.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (32 children)

In Europe soy milk can't legally be called milk anymore. It's Soy Drink on the packaging. The farmers won that one. Now they're coming after vegi burgers allowed to be called burgers.

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dinosaurs back on the menu boyz

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

As a bonus it's much healthier. Win win. Though a large portion of the population won't see it that way.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

may be turned into a culture war battle

May be? Bit optimistic, don't you think?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Me "not eating pork" is already a political statement to my mom's side of the family and has been for a at least a decade. A government body recommending less beef? The horror!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In a new paper, the international financial lender suggests repurposing the billions rich countries spend to boost CO2-rich products like red meat and dairy for more climate-friendly options like poultry, fruits and vegetables.

The politically touchy recommendation — sure to make certain conservatives and European countries apoplectic — is one of several suggestions the World Bank offers to cut climate-harming pollution from the agricultural and food sectors, which are responsible for nearly a third of global greenhouse gas emissions.

According to the report, countries must funnel $260 billion each year into those sectors to get serious about erasing their emissions by 2050 — a common goal for developed economies.

Governments can partly plug the gap by reorienting subsidies for red meat and dairy products toward lower-carbon alternatives, the World Bank says.

The switch is one of the most cost-effective ways for wealthy countries — estimated to generate roughly 20 percent of the world’s agri-food emissions — to reduce demand for highly polluting food, it argues.

Food is an "intensely personal choice," he added, saying he fears that what should be a data-based debate may be turned into a culture war battle.


The original article contains 439 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds good to me, I love chicken and veggies!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Same! Well, TBH chicken often tastes gross to me (grew up with a parent that thought 'boil it in maybe-salted water' was the way to go). But there's plenty of non-beef options! Tofu, turkey, textured vegetable protein, it's all good. (TVP's great for things like sauces, where you just need the texture of ground beef, but the other flavors would drown it out anyway). Even a peanut butter and jelly sandwich makes for an easy work lunches.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

TBH chicken often tastes gross to me (grew up with a parent that thought 'boil it in maybe-salted water' was the way to go).

Funny, this is why most people hate veggies

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, my parents took this approach with veggies too. Luckily it didn't put me off completely, but I can certainly see how it could.

It's a shame how many of my parent's generation just don't know how to cook anything that isn't boil it in a pot until it's soft - it isn't like the other, tastier methods are difficult or take longer either.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I also suspect an overexposure to canned veggies is also to blame. Canned veggies can be soggy-gross. I really like frozen veggies, though. They fill the same "lasts nearly forever" niche, but with a better texture.

Oh, and kale can go stuff itself. Kale and collard greens are the only two leafy greens I just can't stand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Canned green beans are great. I love them mushy, hate them crunchy. No idea why.

Frozen veggies are good, but they don't always cook the same. Frozen Brussels sprouts fry up great, but I tried roasting them on the grill last night and they just turned mushy. Not sure if it was them or me, but I've done fresh ones on the grill just fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Ground turkey is actually a surprisingly good ground beef substitute in a number of dishes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We use ground turkey almost all the time over ground beef. It's great in chili, tacos, meat sauce, lasagna, etc. The only time I use ground beef anymore is when I get it free from my folks (they always support a local 4h kid and purchase part of a cow).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

We've been using ground turkey instead of ground beef for couple of years now, never had a dish where I missed the beef.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Grilled, baked, and fried are all good ways to try chicken but boiled? Damn, no thanks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

TIL some people never heard of poached chicken. It's great if you poach it in really strong stock, comes out really moist. Great for shredding or chunks in salad

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I think the important bit is "maybe-salted water". My same parent didn't like garlic, so I didn't get exposed to it (or most other seasonings) until college.

Not to worry. My partner is trying to make up for lost time keeps incorporating actually-seasoned chicken into meals. I'm to the point where "well, it tastes good when he does it, but I'll still not cook chicken for myself or order it in a restaurant".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›