I mean smaller fish would not get caught in nets. Something something Darwin...
this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
103 points (99.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5178 readers
582 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The article talks about that — species which aren't being fished also got smaller. What's a mystery here is the physiological mechanism that causes fish to grow smaller in warmer water.
Mass Starvation and mass migration due to the climate change
These are the two things that will severely affect every part of the globe in the next few decades. No one will care about why the animals are dying or getting smaller, or why storms are getting worse or why floods are happening .... millions of people will be moving into places where other people already live and people won't like that.
And we'll wonder why the world is degrading and why we are fighting one another.
I agree, except that the majority of us will know full well why the world is degrading and we are fighting one another.
The billions of people who depend on seafood are already in dire straits with richer nations stealing coastal fish from poorer nations.
Okay, so we're getting mad at Norway for legally buying fish from these countries but not at China for literally illegally entering and fishing in poorer nations coastal waters?
Also, what would happen if Norwegian Companies refused to buy african Products or the Norwegian Government put an Embargo on African Fish? wouldn't that be seen as racist or protectionist, as harming the African Economies?
I posted that article as an example to illustrate my point not an overview of the entire topic. It's well researched and quantifies the number of people adversely affected.
I chose it because fewer people know about what Western countries are doing to the sea, than know about China. But since you asked, here's a good article about some of China's predatory fishing practices around poor nations that I posted a few weeks ago.
wouldn’t that be seen as
By whom? I'd love it if the West stopped taking fish from the mouths of poor nations, and so would the millions of people adversely affected by it.
The so called "free market" ideology that if you can legally pay elites for something, you're entitled to take it, has deepened and intrenched global inequality. It has also created grotesque distortions such as food exports from countries in famine.
By whom?
By all the African Nations we would effectively sanction
Also i have to point out the near-colonial mindset of "we know better than you what your country needs, so we're embargoing you to protect your nature"
If anything, the local Government should impose an Export-limitation or even an Export-ban
@Neon yeah I think you need to actually read the article before you @ me about this stuff. You're constructing a massive straw man involving embargos and local companies that has nothing to do with the real situation.
The Feedback report takes a different perspective, recommending the Norwegian government to “halt the growth of Norway’s salmon farming sector” and “ensure the domestic farmed salmon industry does not undermine its global development goals.”
The NGO based its calculations on public commercial data and company reports by the four companies that together supply close to 100% of the feed used in Norwegian salmon farming: Mowi, Dutch-owned Skretting, U.S.-based Cargill and Denmark-based BioMar. According to Feedback’s analysis, all of these companies sourced fish oil made from small pelagics caught in FAO’s Major Fishing Area 34, located off West Africa.
The other day I read the history of the Somalian pirates. Basically corps from wealthy nations like China stole all their fish with bottom trawling, and after the initial failure of their state they had nobody to enforce the rules. They tried chasing off the illegal fishers themselves, but were declared pirates because of that. Then they went "if we are pirates anyway, we might as well", and then we get to the part when the US went in to shoot up their capital and made a movie about it.
Kbin thumbnail bug strikes again, this article has a thumbnail of that US dog killer politician pouting. Makes it look like she's angry she can't kill bigger fish.
Damn, even Mother Nature is hitting us with shrinkflation.