this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

196

16476 readers
2129 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

HP reached its pinnacle in 1993 with the 4L laser printer. They were practically indestructible. I bought one and it took 15 years of heavy use to kill it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This should straight up be illegal

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I made the mistake of buying an HP printer. Fortunately I only spent $70 on it.

Then the ink cartridge ran out as I used all the ink up. So instead of buying more ink I purchased a new printer. This time it was a color inkjet from Brother that will last me years on the first ink cartridge.

Funny how it works. Fuck you HP.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

there's not a single thing radical about wanting these fuckers out of our homes and out of our lives. Kill em all as far as I'm concerned.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

HP is probably the worst big tech device company. Their products are shit, break quickly, are overpriced and econ students love them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

econ students love them.

Why?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They love printing? I guess that’s what he’s saying

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I bought an HP Envy, one of these convertible laptop thingies, when I didn't know any better. The hinge broke about a month after the warranty expired. Repair costs (at a local repair shop, but still) were like 200€ because apparently I had to buy a whole new top cover for the damn repair to work

Anyways, I'm gonna buy a Framework laptop next because fuck going through that again

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spending too much money on bad products is good for the GDP!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

can't buy a good product under capitalism

contradiction in terms

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well you can while they're building the brand and the business majors aren't running every department

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why nobody has made an open source ink jet printer design like reprap, I will never understand. The printer industry seems primed for disruption with all their bullshit and their half century old technology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Right? Why buy a paper printer for less than $100 when you can spend $2000 on a 3D printer + materials and time spent learning and fucking up! Wish I thought of that!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The accuracy required for the ink droplets just isn't there for prosumers.

I can (and have!) built multiple extruders for a variety of 3D printers. Some of my own design.

Sadly, the tolerances for an inkjet are at least an order of magnitude greater.

I have zero doubt that a few clever hardware hackers could design an open source inkjet printer. But A: They'd get sued back to the mesolithic by every printer company with a patent. And B: the process would likely involve micro machining your own hardware.

I've just said, "fuck it" to the entire industry. I'm in my early 40s and I'm reasonably sure that my Brother laser will outlive me. And possibly the heat death of the universe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Patents expire after, what, 20 years? I'd be happy with an open source printer based on 20 year old technology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'd take a tractor fed dot-matrix printer over my current one just so I could play with the paper thingies on the edges.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Probably because they wouldn't be as profitable.

HP could sell like a tenth the printers and still make more money

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hmmm we don't need to build a new printer, just new firmware. More like ddwrt or tomato

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My guess. They couldn't get the printer to work. My 3D printer has a lower problem count than my ink jet regular printed at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And this is why things like pirating are not only acceptable but necessary. When companies lock services behind paywalls for products we should legally own, we are left with no recourse but to obtain the services we are owed illegally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Piracy, aka the sharing of information freely (see also: libraries), is a fundamentally ethically correct course of action. Always.

Withholding knowledge for personal profit on the other hand is obviously not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have literally filed a BBB complaint in the past for HP over their stupid ink subscription being fucky

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

From what I've heard the BBB is as much a BS organization as HP, companies can pay to have the complaints removed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's basically a business owner guild, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I honestly don't know enough to say, I'm just repeating what I've heard from others many times over the last decade or so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They are useless, as anyone who's ever tried to get redress through them knows. Don't trust their ratings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Planned obsolescence iceberg when

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›