Man, what's a lot of Disney.
Movies
Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!
Related Communities:
[email protected] - Discussing books and book-related things.
[email protected] - A place to discuss comic books of all types.
[email protected] - LW's home for all things MCU.
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
-
Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
-
Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
-
Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
-
Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.
Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.
Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.
Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.
Counting the number of Hollywood releases which performed decently-majeestically would be far easier
How in the hell did "Wish" cost 200 million to produce. It looks like a videogame.
The Haunted Mansion was decent, it made me want to see LaKeith Stanfield star in more fun adventure movies (something like Brendan Frasier's The Mummy).
Wish was a mess, it felt like they wanted to make a Disney multiverse movie but chickened out and just made a bland Disney movie that constantly references better Disney movies (mostly Snow White to the point where you wonder if Wish is intended to be its prequel). A couple songs were decent but the bulk them felt unpolished and forgettable, like they needed a few more edits and re-writes to come together. The anti-establishment themes were weak and made me wish I were re-watching Nimona instead.
The Marvels was good as a Ms. Marvel TV special but not as a Captain Marvel blockbuster.
Yeah, Wish is an odd movie to watch. It's not too clear why this movie even exists except to promote the 100 years for Disney which doesn't really happen till the credits roll. Maybe they thought if we didn't understand a reference made in the film we would be motivated to watch other Disney content ?
I'm surprised about Indiana Jones. It was my favorite of all the movies. Back to OG story with Greek history, Nazis, and a little supernatural stuff. I watched it twice.
Your favorite of all of them? Really? I'm honestly curious because I found it pretty terrible, in the vein of crystal skull more than the OGs. In my view it was all over the place, didn't tell a cohesive story, and dragged on for at least 45 minutes longer than it should've. I'm having trouble even recalling what the movie was even about and it's only been a couple months.
It was better than Crystal Skull because it didn't quite so explicitly sci-fi the magic, the set pieces were a little better, and Helena was less annoying than Mutt, but both movies are sort of equally useless, and openly depressed Indy was VERY depressing. The character always had some undiagnosed mental health issues pushing him towards unhealthy risk-taking, but Mangold's Indy just made me sad.
Marvels wasn't bad. I enjoyed it. I feel like it was a combination of poor advertising and comic book movie/series fatigue.
The Marvels was the best movie on this list by a wide margin.
The leads are good, with Brie Larson finally relaxing a little, they actually let the pace breathe once or twice, and the switching gimmick made for some visually interesting fights. It suffered from MCU-villain syndrome and had a kind of light vibe that didn't quite jibe with the budget, but I think long term it'll be a minor gem, at least among people who don't reflexively hate superheroes who depart from looking and acting like stoically traumatized WW2 veterans.
Also Disney+ existing. Why go see something in a theater when it's coming to a streaming service I already have in a few months?
I've been complaining about this for a while, but Disney has not been giving fans a chance to catch up with its theatrical release schedule. Since Shang-Chi, Marvel has released 9 films back-to-back, each one ending its theatrical run before the previous film was available on Disney+. I know this because I missed seeing Shang-Chi in the theaters, and didn't want to see anything that might have spoilers. This gets especially complicated when the TV shows tie into the movies, so you end up putting off entire seasons for months, avoiding discussion forums and Marvel memes for fear of spoilers.
Add to that the mixed quality of their movies, and it really killed any momentum they had even among die-hard fans like myself.
I'm finally caught up now, and think Deadpool and Wolverine could save the entire MCU, but I really hope they stick with the reduced frequency. That, or bring the movies to streaming faster.
If they want people to get excited about a shared cinematic universe, they should reward fans with tie-ins rather than punishing them for failing to keep up.
How is the net loss calculated? The difference between box office and budget doesn't seem to cover it
Edit: Oh, budget doesn't mean studio expenses. The difference is shown in the article. What does "budget" cover then?
Edit2: And box office doesn't mean revenue. What a wonderful way of reporting on financial situation
I read a while back that studios fudge numbers to make it look like they lost money on movies, or make it look like they made less overall. This way they can get tax cuts and not pay royalties until the movie has made money.
So the listed numbers are completely useless?
Just about. The article has the actual numbers for expenses and revenue, much more helpful.
Hollywood accounting is a world intrigue and mysteries...
Yeah it's completely unreliable as they have a vested interest in making it appear as though they made a loss much of the time.
They also don't count major income sources like merchandising deals, which can generate several times more than the box office revenue. Franchises like star wars and the MCU generate billions from toys, games, etc.
I instantly hate any movie where I can see that they introduce a character that would be easy to assemble in a factory assembly line.
Like always within the first 20 minutes of one of these movies they introduce a side character like "this is round thing and his eyes glow when he's angry." Or " that guy over there, that's OlafD2 the cuddle pillow that vibrates when danger is near."
If your pillow vibrates, danger is definitely near; it's vibrating because the spider eggs have hatched.
Disney: "We dominate the board, wooo!"