this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

196

16476 readers
2143 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Can someone translate from freedom into logical

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

What is that in a normal unit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Life hack: if you don't eat meat you don't need to worry about meatborne illnesses.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm finding the way the points and the y-axis are lining up to be, dare I say, mildly infuriating. Why is 82 at 70? Why is 0 not at 0?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not very helpful for real world cooking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Well, one could probably deduce that a lower internal temperature than the instant point is sufficient to cook chicken, and use that in combination with a thermometer when cooking chicken.

In fact, that's what I've done after learning this, bringing my chicken breasts only up to ~68 C (~155 F), resulting in a vastly more enjoyable chicken breast.

So I'd argue the opposite - this is very helpful for real world cooking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For those of us living after the 19th century 55 degrees is the amount of time to start killing pathogens, 60 ℃ needed to take 35 minutes, down to 14 minutes at 63 ℃, 66 ℃ is 5 min, 69 ℃ is 1 min, 72 ℃ is just half a minute, and 74 ℃ is instantaneous.

Probably worth adding that just putting a piece of chicken in the oven at 100 ℃ is obviously not going to kill all bacteria. It takes time for the heat to be transferred from the oven to the room-temperature (or colder) internals of the chicken.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I read this to mean the temperature using a meat thermometer, poking it in the thickest part.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah exactly, that would be correct. The need to do something like that was what I was trying to point to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Keep in mind that this graph shows core temperature. It is obvious to most but it should be written down.

Don't want someone with little to no cooking experience look at this chart and put his huge turkey for a couple of seconds in the oven at 165°F / 74°C 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Real talk, “pasteurize” is the stupidest most misaligned word that could have possibly been used for the process of sterilizing via heat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Pasteur

It's named after the inventor of the process though. Heat things to kill bacteria.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Oh that makes sense

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Oh that makes sense

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

It should be "Pasteurize", as it's named after Louis Pasteur. And the specific process he invented dramatically increases the shelf life of milk using very high temperatures for a very short time.... Without changing the milk texture or cooking it very much.

So pasteurization is a process that sterilises did with heat. But I don't think it works on meat.