this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

Australia

3520 readers
122 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/8872514

The ‘solar gardeners’, who mostly live in cities hours away, are getting returns of $505, possibly higher, locked in for the next decade, depending on the electricity market

The returns are credited directly to their electricity bills.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just to clarify the dollar figures as I was a bit confused just reading the post text:

Each ‘plot’ cost $4,200, which buys approximately three kilowatts of solar panels

will get at least $455 off their power bills for the next decade, with $505 a year for the first five years locked in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

So a non refundable return of over 10% with an expected break even at year 10. Hmm, that's not a good investment. Also I adds no value to your property.

I'm gonna call it, the farmer put up $100k in solar and sold it for $200k with a dividend plan for what it produces.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

That place name has got to be one of the most aesthetically displeasing ones I’ve ever heard.

I mean, that’s a sound effect, not a name.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

How about Wagga Wagga? Gol Gol? Minyip?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

@beeng @maculata I always liked Tumbi Umbi and Kangy Angy, reminds me of Tellytubbies

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Albacutya? Patchewollock? Pigick?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

@Baku @beeng Wollongong… classic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

@Baku @beeng Or Boronia.

Because when you say the name, you think of... Boronia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I’m pretty sure Wagga Wagga is where Fozzy Bear lives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

"don't need a gun, I've got a Donk!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The name means "very bad camping ground" in the local Wiradjuri language. I don't speak the language, but from what little I know of first nations languages I'm guessing a singular "grong" would be "bad camping ground" and duplicating it as "grong grong" makes it "very bad".

So yeah, intentionally displeasing. It has reliable water where two creeks join and become one larger creek, which meant it was a place you could camp if you were on your way to somewhere else and needed to stop, but otherwise it's not somewhere you wanted to be.

White people established a town there because it was a good place to access water for steam trains - which needed to stop every 10 to 50km to fill up their water tanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Thanks for the info.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago