this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
137 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

58144 readers
3820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/2686042

Humane AI Pin: much-hyped gadget rocked by bad reviews

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/BubblyMcnutty on 2024-04-17 10:40:02.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Good preview of most "AI" products being peddled by force

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"much hyped" lol I have seen not one person who was positively looking forward to this. I don't really know why such dead in the water stupid idead even get any media attention at all.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I thought it sounded neat, but I’m actively looking for a fun way to ditch regular smartphones. As soon as that rotary cell phone works on regular networks, I’m there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I guess if the AI works well, it could have some niche uses. But as far as I have seen it doesn't. It is also more marketed as a smartphone replacement, which for the vast majority of people it just wouldn't be. Also the demo examples like booking flights are just moronic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah the product they delivered is clearly not what was promised. I lost interest as soon as the subscription model was made obvious.

Personally I’d just like my phone to allow others to contact me and search the internet, that’s all. I don’t need to text constantly, and other than lemmy I have no social media presence. Laser-display voice-control smart-broach actually fits the bill for me, provided it actually fucken worked at all lmao

Also I just really like weird or novel tech. I was an early supporter of pebble and the only thing I regret there is not buying doubles.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I honestly dislike voice control very much. Would be pretty annoying to constantly have people around who are talking to their devices. It's already jarring enough when you are a gust at somebodys home and they scream at their alexa every couple minutes, ruins the mood a little bit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

God I hadn’t even considered what “voice control only” would mean for public spaces. You’re right, that sounds like a nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I could have told them this was a dumb idea from the start; creating something that doesn’t fill a need, is just another device to carry around and could just be an app on a phone that we already carry around, just to cram it down people’s throats “because AI,” is probably not a good business plan.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

... and require a subscription too!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Wow, I didn’t even realize that it requires a $24.99 per month plan from T-Mobile for voice, texting and data. These companies are getting really brazen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This pretty well describes smart watches in my mind outside of those that need to keep track of certain vitals all of the time as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I used to feel the same, but they do fit a bit of a need for me. They work great as a silent alarm so you don’t wake up anyone else in your room, you don’t have to take your phone out to check time or notifications, and health and fitness tracking is better than what a phone can offer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you add a strap to it, it will be smartwatch. So there's a need and a niche, just not for one more way to do the same stuff

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That’s not a bad idea, but why not just integrate that functionality into a smartwatch?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

This is exactly what I meant: they're selling a watch without a strap, and saying it's something new

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

How are you going to sell that? It already exists, so it won't draw venture capital that you can siphon off until the whole thing collapses.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago

Because AI is the new because blockchain.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It got funded to the tune of $240m. Which was probably about as far as they thought this through.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I can’t imagine they thought this would be a serious product.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

nad, an cheap Android phone for less than $200 can do the job.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

My first Android phone from 2010 was better at this and it didn't even have multitouch and just 160 MB of usable storage.

load more comments
view more: next ›