this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
162 points (96.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43853 readers
1686 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most are probably too young to remember but nanotechnology was supposed to be the most super amazing thing ever.

(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (7 children)

nanotechnology was supposed to be the most super amazing thing ever.

Like blockchain, 3d-printing, cloud and machine learning?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (11 children)

I'm no nanotech scientist, so I won't pretend I know all of the ins and outs here, but I'm sure when most people think about nanotechnology, they're probably picturing something like the later generation iron man suit from the marvel movies made up of billions of tiny nanobots that can reconfigure themselves and such. If such things will ever be possible, they're still a long way off

I have a hunch you probably have some visions in your head of tiny robots similar in size to a red blood cell swimming around in someone's blood stream, that seemed like a trope that was used by a few different sci Fi series when I was growing up, and certainly the kind of thing I personally picture when I think of nanobots. Problem is, at the nano scale, those kinds of things are kind of huge, a blood cell is a few thousand nanometers across. Most of what we're doing with nanotechnology is just a handful of nanometers in size, at the scale of a few molecules or even atoms. Eventually we may be able to put some of those parts together to make tiny robots and computers and such, but right now we're still kind of figuring out how to make the nuts and bolts and gears and such to make those bots out of.

There's also a lot of nanotech research that you may not really think of as technology but more as something like material science or chemistry. Any time you hear about new developments with carbon nanotubes or graphene, that's nanotechnology. Practical applications for stuff like that are still mostly works in progress, we're probably years, decades, maybe even centuries out before some of those things really come into their own, but when we do work out the bugs, they will absolutely be revolutionary.

But it's not all far future stuff, it's almost guaranteed that you have used and maybe even have in your home or on your person right now something that makes use of nanotech in some way. One example I saw mentioned a lot is sunscreen, there's a lot of sunblock that makes use of zinc oxide and/or titanium dioxide nanoparticles, clothing may contain nanoparticles to help with things like waterproofing, reducing odor, etc. there's lots of mundane nanotech that you're probably already taking advantage of.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

I'm studying nano science right now, I think it still exists. And if it does it's still a super amazing thing.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It split into two.

The “very small scale structure manufacturing” part is alive and kicking. You are holding about a trillion perfect nanoscale devices in the palm of your hand right now.

The “we will make tiny robots that live in your body and fix you” club was always selling snake oil-and they knew it. The technology they were pushing just does not work at atmosphere temperature and pressure and immersed in oxidizing not quite neutral pH fluid.

Thankfully, there a much better way to make tiny machines that live in your body. That’s making/adapting/causing others to make proteins that do what you need them to do. Proteins are essentially bio-robots that can manipulate their surrounding by changes in their folds (conformation), for example by exposing binding sites in reaction to something binding to another binding site.

TLDR: nanotech is one of the largest industries in the planet. A lot of promises were made by idiots in the nineties, but biotech, another huge industry, has picked up the slack very well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (6 children)

It became normal and normal is boring.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I heard Bill gates installed it in covid vaccine for like 2 years straight.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For every vial, someone had to click next next finish, such an evil overlord

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

They should invent microscopic IT guys to do that automatically

[–] [email protected] 62 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's used in medicine, meta materials, and physics everyday.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The reason pencils work as well as they do is because of the way they are constructed, of nanomaterials.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Graphite is now a nano material?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well it's not suddenly a nano material. It's always been one. We are still exploring it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Much like one of the ways stained glass was colored in the medieval period involved adding materials to the glass that acted as nano materials. For example this one particular shade of red needed gold.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 7 months ago

This. You just don’t hear the word anymore. For example, it was instrumental in producing the COVID-19 vaccine.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

Totally replaced by the most super amazing AI ever

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (3 children)

While we're at it, how about cybernetics, too?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

At least we don't need Neuropozyne (Deus Ex).

Btw, what happened with the nanotubes-coated contacts that neurons are all too happy to connect to?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Prostetics have gotten extremely advanced in the last 20 years. People are controlling and getting real feedback from replacement limbs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Yeah, both nanotech and cybernetics are everyday things. Still very expensive, but both have mostly reached enough milestones that they go by whatever their more specific puposes are. Like prothetics with feedback aren't called cybernetics because cybernetics is too broad a term.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 181 points 7 months ago (4 children)

It’s still here, but you aren’t seeing it because it’s really small.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

It wasn't a big deal after all

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

That's exactly what my ex wife said.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago

It is still around, only the buzz around it died

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›