Not a problem. Glad to help.
Science Memes
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- !reptiles and [email protected]
Physical Sciences
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and [email protected]
- [email protected]
- !self [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Memes
Miscellaneous
Finally
The universe started with a Big Bang, I guess it makes sense it'd go out on the BIG HONK
Well, that happens sometimes
Do I truly know the goose, or am I simply aware of its existence? Considering the universe has not ended, it would seem that simply being aware of the goose's existence is not enough to truly "know" the goose, and as such indicates that the word "unknowable" does not refer to knowledge of the goose's existence, but instead refers to understanding the goose. This is a good example of knowing being erroneously conflated with understanding.
Understanding implies knowledge, but the reverse is untrue. Knowing that 2+2=4 doesn't help you do simple arithmetic if you don't understand why 2+2=4; it simply allows you to announce "4!" whenever asked what 2+2 is equal to. If you were asked, "what does 2+1 equal" you would be understandably befuddled as you lack the understanding to deduce that 2+1 is one less than 2+2, and therefore is equal to 3.
A good example of this concept could be the overhyped "LLM". An LLM contains a lot of knowledge about many different things. However, it understands none of it. The result is that simple changes in how requests are phrased can radically change the accuracy of the information received. It doesn't understand how a car works, and so it doesn't understand that fueling a car with water is impossible. All it knows is that the word "gasoline" (or "petrol" for those of you in Europe) is typically involved when discussing cars, internal combustion, and fuel sources in the same breath.
To return to our goose, it seems the goose is perfectly knowable, in that I'm capable of being aware of its existence; but it is in fact the understanding of the goose which is impossible. I hope to understand the goose some day. Perhaps once this reality is gone, a newer, better one may take it's place.
Yeah but you try saying 'ununderstandable' after a couple of drinks
I thought this had already happened several times.
oops!
Oh no!
now reality will end
Oh thank god
Drat. Not again!
Know thyself
and now reality will end.
FINALLY.
Don't you dare get my hopes up.
Well, shit. Sorry everyone, I'm new here.
I'm going to assume that there is no context here that I'm missing.
embrace the void, brother
Finally