this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
75 points (97.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
179 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Do we though? Can't we ramp up local storage and production with solar and batteries on and in buildings?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Yes, but companies want handouts to put solar on their roof (and for the batteries too)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Batteries are expensive, short lived, less efficient, and polluting. They're better than fossil fuels, but if they can be avoided they should.

Solar also isn't very practical in CBDs, so you end up generating excess power in more rural areas and transporting it into densely populated areas, like most other commodities.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Replacing existing power lines with cables made from state-of-the-art materials could roughly double the capacity of the electric grid in many parts of the country,

Ah but that costs money and eats into profits.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Coincidentally, there's a cheaper way too. :)

The ratings of existing power lines can be recalculated on an hourly basis according to outdoor temperature and wind.

That however, requires software and agility, which big companies seldom have... and it doesn't help during a heat wave with no wind, of course.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Won’t be any money if there isn’t any power.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

What will happen is that utilities will take about a year to file an IRP with a rate increase, have it under consideration for a year, and then when it’s invariably passed, they will subcontract the work to a corporation the utility owns (at a big markup), complete about 40% of the work, report a massive profit to their shareholders while reporting to your utility commission that they need more rate hikes, citing extenuating circumstances, the economy, the usual “please give us socialism” corporate nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

But that won't happen this quarter. So why pay for it from this quarter's budget when we can deferr it until after I my promotion. Got to keep my number good.