this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
1331 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

12359 readers
2767 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (22 children)

The underlying truth of this joke is: Programming syntax is less confusing than mathematical syntax. There are genuinely ambiguous layouts of syntax in math (to a human reader that hasn't internalized PEMDAS, anyways) whereas you get a compilation error if ANYTHING is ambiguous in programming. (yes, I am WELL aware of the frustrations of runtime errors)

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

(I used(LISP)one time(and it(permanently))changed the way I (program(computers)))

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

My calculator uses a stack instead of brackets. #RPN4Life

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Ok man. Wtf did I just watch...

I get it. We are here on the somehow dark side of the internet..

But THIS.... without any context. i mean. Im questioning live here man. What do you want to express with that?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Improved readability is always good

[–] [email protected] 227 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (17 children)

As a software developer, the less ambiguous your notation is, the better it is for everyone involved. Not only will I use brackets, I'll split my expression into multiple rows and use tabs to make it as readable as humanly possible. And maybe throw a comment or 2 if there's still some black magic involved

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

I genuinely hate being human for this stuff. So many things have such crazy computational shortcuts, it's sometimes difficult to remember which part represents reality. Outside of the realm of math, where "imaginary" numbers are still a touch of enigma to me, so many algorithms are based on general assumptions about reality or the specific task, that the programmatic approach NEVER encapsulates the full scope of the problem.

As in, sometimes if you know EXACTLY how a tool works, you might still have no idea about the significance of that tool. Even in a universe where no one is lazy, and everyone wants to know "why?", the answers are NOT forthcoming.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

You're a good human being.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 10 months ago (11 children)

No just write the entire code in one line totally perfect.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Excel has entered the chat

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"don't worry, you just need this simple one-liner to fix your project"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The one-liner: *parses HTML with a regex*

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago

Also works if you dont trust yourself with correctly ordering your operations.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›