this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Death to NATO

1552 readers
2 users here now

For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Powerful Soviet-era weapons

Russia’s newest weapon

There are four lines of text and photo separating these two statements at the very beginning of the article. And they're both talking about the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Let’s be fair here, it said:

Powerful Soviet-era weapons modified with fins and sat-navs

i.e., taking old Soviet-era dumb bombs and installing new flight control kits on them and converting them into glide bombs, which is now a new type of weapon. Kinda like JDAM but much cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm no ordinance nerd so feel free to correct me.

I was under the impression that JDAMS were just dumb bombs that were dropped above their target (more vertical than horizontal from target) with some ability to adjust their fall to stay on a target.

Glide bombs seem like cheaper versions of the Cruise Missile idea, no? (Explosive payload delivered at lower altitude and high rate of speed from a platform that is farther away on the horizontal than the vertical axis from a target.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

They are talking about KAB series bomb, which is modification of WW2 era FAB bomb. It's been in service since 1975, though it's more effective now since guidance systems were improved but it's essentially still a 50 year old modification of a over 80 year weapon.
If Ukraine thinks it's a wunderwaffe it only means they don't have any anti air capablity since plane using those would be pretty vulnerable to modern systems.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I mean, most modern Russian weapon systems are based on the soviet design. There are some cutting edge doohickeys that probably aren't - such as Su-57, Kinzhal missile - but the stuff normally getting used - Su-25s, Grads, T-72 of whichever modifications there are - are at their core soviet systems

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It reads like Soviet-era gear has some magic properties, like some legendary sword in an RPG

That's badass but also very telling of how the media will spin everything to not admit thah NATO/Ukraine are just bad at this and get steamrolled by 40 years old tech

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"Forged in the anvils of Stalingrad by the man himself, it glows red when counter-revolutionaries are present and can vanquish an M1 Abrams or HIMARS with just a single swipe, sending them into the eternal gulag"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

American weapons since the change of the American weapon mentality that emerged in the mid 20th century have been overengineered that always assume you’re in the ideal circumstance… weapons companies intentionally design their weapons and war machines to break down easily to make more money including making systems obtuse requiring a first party engineer to repair it (something impossible in an ACTUAL war). That’s why the Vietnamese would only ever pick up M16s if they ran out of AK47s.

The American weapons of war are great initially but are unreliable in the long term.