this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
299 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59161 readers
1960 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (10 children)

It's a woman looking over their shoulder

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Huh, I am sorry, I feel too dumb but I don't want to live with the doubt, I read the article and the Wikipedia links and I still don't know how this is a thing, this is the first time I know about it.

What exactly was the meaning of this image in the tech fields? "What image processing tests"?

I understand the model is tired of it already, but this won't disappear from the Internet, how is this article gonna benefit her?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Computers are dumb and need to be told how to take the data of an image (stored as a long series of 1s and 0s in memory) and draw it on the screen so you can see it. The people writing the software to do that needed an image to test with, just to make sure everything was working right.

Either because they were a bunch of lonely geeks in the 70s or they didn't have any other good photos to scan in, they used a headshot of a PlayBoy model. They couldn't have known that it would effectively become one of the first digital memes, meaning it's still semi-frequently used by graphics programmers (professionals and enthusiasts).

I can't claim to speak on the model's motives, but it's not hard to imagine that having their headshot used in perpetuity without consent would make someone uncomfortable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Basically, people working on graphics-related algorithms needed to build a library of standard test images, so that when people published their work in an academic journal, they could easily demonstrate what that algorithm does, in a manner that is fairly obvious to anyone who is familiar with the image.

So someone, when they needed to pick an image that represents a person, scanned this photograph. And it could be argued that at the time, it was probably an interesting test image for a lot of reasons: person vs background, different textures, areas with soft and sharp focus, etc etc. If you developed, say, an image compression algorithm, those things are going to be headache in all photo portraits.

It's probably not the best image by modern standards (being a low resolution scan of a photograph off of a printed magazine - not a photo print scan, not a direct film scan, and not comparable to digital photography). Also, it's gotten overused to the point of absurdity. (Oh your hot new face detection algorithm works on this image? Well whoop-de-do.)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/yCdwm2vo09I

Here you go. A full explanation of everything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/yCdwm2vo09I

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

i think i've seen it used to demo different image compression algorithms, things like that. it was used as an easy example test image, but this journal has now banned papers from using it because it is weird and creepy to be using cropped porn for that. this won't benefit the model, but she was only pushing to ban it because she wants more women in IT fields.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (6 children)

If a sample image is "making some women feel unwelcome in the field" you may be too sensitive for life.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (8 children)

This is not porn; it's an art. There is nothing creepy about it. Moreover, if this picture is the reason why women aren't in this field, then there is definitely a more serious problem, but it's not where you are looking.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Everything about Playboy is creepy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

It's both. It's artsy softcore pornography.

I certainly don't think the full version would be appropriate, but I'm ambivalent about the cropped version.

I don't think people should get their knickers in a twist about sex in the first place.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›