this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Music

7964 readers
17 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

They don't need money to survive, they just need exposure which is what Spotify provides them. Musicians can survive indefinitely on nothing but praise cocaine and exposure.

/J

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Commercial radio stations pay about 12 cents per play, while college stations pay about 6 cents per play. Half of the money goes to the publisher and half goes to the songwriter or songwriters.

It's always been a crap shoot for musicians. They make more money touring which is why even really successful musicians tour well into their twilight years.

Record sales are also a crapshoot. Someone else posted the numbers for those in this thread. Streaming allows more access by more people to more music. But that access results in a cost. The cost is less pay per listen. The entire industry is broken.

https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/926850/-/comment/5918633

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

700,000 streams per month across their entire discography gets you to the poverty wage for an individual.

Plus it is entirely passive income once the songs are out so they could tour live in addition, or go get a non-music job if it's not enough.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because there's a fuckload of people streaming and because they've already paid for it, they do it for hours every day.

There's artists on tens of billions of streams. That's enough to live on for anyone.

Of course if you've got only a few thousand streams then you're going to make fuck all, but you probably weren't going to make anything anyway. You might get a few fans from discovering things on Spotify who might turn up to your gigs or buy that T-shirt or whatever, but with that number of listeners you probably wouldn't even have got any radio play in the old days, let alone make money from albums.

Most people never make money on art, no matter which art it is, or what business model they use. It's just life. If you never hit that mainstream vein, you're going to need a proper job.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Cooking is a form of art.

That'll be a 25% tip for your server.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I love how in this scenario cooking is the art but the guy walking your food to you feels like the star.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Easy.

The average middle class income in Canada is $70,000. All I have to do is get 40.5 million streams per year to afford a small home 2 hours away from the city where I play music.

Honestly, you can be a full-time musician or you can have a comfortable life. You can't have both.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're probably still right but the comparison to a job doesn't make sense because the labor component isn't continuous for streaming. The job would be live touring, streaming would be additional income on top.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I would agree, but shows on the road habitually pay close to nothing because musician compensation hasn't really increased in the last half century. So generally you make money off of album sales and merch sales at shows, not really money to live off of either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

uh cool trick, they don't.

Turns out small artists who pay middle men (publishers, who rake in billions a year) money to host their music on platforms like spotify, who then makes zero money because they run an unprofitable business (damn, if only there was a way to make money from this) and the listeners, who earn them, on average, 0 dollars, from a stream. Which means they lose money.

Pirating your favorite bands music is going to make you more likely to buy an actual physical release, or digital. Thus paying them more in that one interaction than they have potentially ever been paid in your lifetime of listening to them on a streaming service.

Btw, just have a think about the fact that artists, and spotify make ZERO money, more than likely negative money. Only to have a middle man raking in literally BILLIONS of dollars a year. Capitalism truly is something isn't it? Oh and i haven't even mentioned money laundering on spotify either, that's a whole other thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Please mention money laundering on Spotify. My friend wants to learn how to... Fight... This behavior in his detective work.

Yes, that's it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

something something, you build a gang, and you recruit young people who are below the age of being prosecuted, have them make music, music bot the music, and then you proceed to collect royalties on money you never made. All while actively washing drug money or something. Something something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

To be clear, you in no way shape or form are intending for your comment to be an implication against Cash Money Records. while Cash Money Records aknowledges that behavior may be common in the industry, CMR 100℅ has never and will never engage in this behavior.

Oh, you weren't accusing us directly. We didn't need to make this statement.... Fuck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

it sure is. Benn jordan has a good video on it as of recent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›