this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1210 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59271 readers
3936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Now we need to do this California to seal the deal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I can't wait to get back to Oregon

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Is this actually good news? What can a single state do? Shouldn't this be federal?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

They can ban selling products which do it

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

A single state is still a large market to pass up, and tooling costs make it impractical to manufacture different versions of things.

Even for software, the US experiences positive externalities of the GDPR and the rest of the US does from privacy laws in California and Illinois (likely others that I don't know off the top of my head)

State laws also often serve as the prototype for federal ones.

It should be federal, but this is absolutely good news.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't states go after companies under the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act instead of writing new state legislation.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›