this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2792 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The targeting of another U.S.-owned commercial ship Wednesday shows the militant group remains intent on continuing its attacks in the face of multiple rounds of U.S. military airstrikes.

The Houthis launched anti-ship ballistic missiles at the U.S.-owned, flagged and operated commercial ship Maersk Detroit as it was transiting the Gulf of Aden, according to a statement from the U.S. Central Command. The U.S. Navy destroyer USS Gravely shot down two missiles and a third fell into the water. There were no indications of damage or injuries in the attack.

The U.S. military has been conducting airstrikes against the Houthis to degrade their capabilities since Jan.11, after several weeks of attacks on commercial ships by the militant group.

(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Q: Are the airstrikes in Yemen working?

Biden: Well, when you say "working". Are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they going to continue? Yes.

Typical US anti-terrorism policy

https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=33&v=Y8h2dqEIMyE&feature=youtu.behttps%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FY8h2dqEIMyE%3Fsi%3D2OC7r5ZufntZIWSI&t

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://m.piped.video/watch?t=33&v=Y8h2dqEIMyE&feature=piped.videohttps%3A%2F%2Fpiped.video%2FY8h2dqEIMyE%3Fsi%3D2OC7r5ZufntZIWSI&t

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Man tankies just really infest the fediverse. I wish reality was as simple as they like to pretend it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (19 children)

Saying that you support the Houthis in their efforts to stop genocide does not mean you agree with everything they stand for.

You don't have to unequivocally support a group to encorse one specific action.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Attacking civilian ships with civilian crews does nothing to stop genocide; it's just terrorism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maersk said both vessels carried cargo belonging to the U.S. Defense and State Departments, as well as other government agencies, meaning they were “afforded the protection of the U.S. Navy for passage through the strait.”

Don't fall for propaganda like a dumbass. These two ships were carrying DOD cargo.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're telling me military action doesn't stop terrorism??

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't prevent terrorism, but where the hits land it does usually stop whatever is going on.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In the very short term yeah, but in the longer term it INCREASES terrorism by making it easier for terrorists to radicalize people who lost loved ones.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Buddy, we got enough bombs here to light up every one of these Houthis.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Not without killing a shitload of innocent civilians, which is THE most effective way to create MORE terrorism.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

What’s the current civilian death count with these strikes? Like average

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I do think this is a strategic miss step from the Hooti Bros. Attacking global trade is the fast track to be on the wrong end of universally approved military actions .

…and I have a horrible feeling Iran might just be about to order in some Freedom & Democracy . US and UK are in election cycles, and tough looking leaders win votes .

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Maersk said both vessels carried cargo belonging to the U.S. Defense and State Departments, as well as other government agencies, meaning they were “afforded the protection of the U.S. Navy for passage through the strait.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Darn Hoothi's standing up to Genocide.

America isn't starting more wars because they can't afford it, not because they're so nice. The Hoothies can blow up Saudi's oil infrastructure which is going to make this global shipping blockade look like a complete joke in comparison.

Ukraine and israel are draining the budget. If America starts escalating the middle east they won't be able to keep their aircraft carriers next to Taiwan. Fighting one war at a time is easy but it's starting to stack up.

Middle Eastern issues never seem to get solved with more violence. The freedom and democracy barrage is just going to backfire as it always has.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

lol Ukraine is a bargain. I think the US has spent maybe 2% of the entire military budget supplying Ukraine with weapons. In exchange we get to see the last large generation of Russians turned into fertilizer along with all of their frontline hardware.

Israel is perfectly capable of turning the Gaza Strip into a moonscape without much support from the US.

The US hasn’t even touched the hardware needed to take on China (long range missiles and aircraft). On top of that we now have a west that is more united than ever behind the American Hegemony.

I think the US can afford to let a few off the chain and rain some good old fashioned freedom on a few Houthis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (11 children)

You're talking like Goku is stronger than One Punch Man because he can go SSJ9001. War isn't some attack power meter where the party with more attack power just magically wins. Tell me how more about how America just won against the Taliban.

Israel's iron meme system got wrecked by a bunch of Hamas fireworks. Their wall penetrated like it's nothing. Just like how israel can flatten Gaza, Hezbollah can flatten israel. Everyone can flatten each other these days. Rockets and Drones are insanely cheap and stopping them is expensive.

The question is if you think that's a good solution to the problem. From behind your keyboard it must look really funny.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Good points each of them, and it’s why I wonder if the US might move to conclude some of them, rather than have them nagging on .

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

America is probably going to drop and screw over Ukraine if the budget gets tight. But the Hoothi problem looks unsolvable with military force. Saudi tried that for quite a while with American weapons. And America just lost to the Taliban trying to do the same thing.

By for the easiest solution is to reign in Netanyahu and stop the Genocide in Gaza. Hoothi demands are what I would call "normal to anyone that isn't a genocidal maniac".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Was about to say the same thing.

Unless they want to keep grinding Putin by proxy, Big Z might be not be getting his calls returned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So instead of fucking off, they're still fucking around. Well, there's plenty of Find Out to go around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Oh wait, I thought your comment was about American cargo ships. I'm like "fuck yeah! That's punk rock, they should respect the protest (mostly cause the protest comes with missiles) and go around. Never cross a pocket line, bruv" but I think I misread the situation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah because more military action is going to stop terrorism! Have people learned NOTHING from the Bush administration and the wars they started??

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You do realize that Americans get boners from this, right? Americans LOVE getting attacked so they can use their billions of dollars worth of weapons that they've been hoarding. Then resell it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Some do, yeah. Doesn't mean I'm not going to point out the futility of it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What's the play to stop this then?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not support Israel's genocide. I'd wager that'd help.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure, agreed, probably. I don't believe one atrocity justifies another though (like the holocaust doesn't justify... Literally anything they've used it as justification for), and the problem is the houthis aren't just fucking with US and Israeli related ships, they're impacting global trade.

Backing down in the face of violence (even if it is the correct thing to do in this particular situation) only empowers them to cause more violence because it works. That's why the US doesn't (typically) negotiate with terrorists.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Yeah I'm not saying the Houthis are right here (they're being too indiscriminate), but giving into their demands is objectively the morally correct action. They're using a wrong method to make a correct point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

And even if you're a ghoul and think that complying with that very reasonable demand wouldn't stop the Houthis, why not call their bluff? It costs us nothing to simply stop allowing the genocide to happen, and if the Houthis continue attacking ships, then you have a much more legitimate reason to go after them.

Or are the people that are in favor of bombing Yemen just really eager to bomb?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It CoStS us nOtHiNg

You really don’t know what you’re talking about when it comes to policy. It’s not just a simple “okay let’s cut ties with Israel”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Calling for a cease fire isn't "cutting ties with Israel", and if you think that funding a genocidal ethnostate is a necessary part of foreign policy, your foreign policy would have been very helpful for the Axis Powers, you absolute monster.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The Saudis have been bombing it for Allah knows how long, so it's business as usual for everyone involved.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Violence is being done to this group at such an alarming rate that it's being treated as normal. So violence is fine, they're used to it"

That's what that sounded like to me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that was already pointed out.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

I was asking because I couldn’t tell if your comment was sarcastic or not.

I was trying to figure out if I was getting whooshed. lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's neither here, nor there. The answer isn't to make the bombing in Yemen worse.

If the only demand is to stop genociding Palestinians, then the US government should simply stop supporting Israel in their genocide.

If the Houthis continue attacking ships after that, then by all means, do what you need to do to handle the Houthis. But the US government can't even be bothered to call for a ceasefire, so they leave it up to militant groups to act.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (8 children)

I don't know. I don't have to in order to recognize the fact that military action only exacerbates the problem by making it easier to radicalize the people whose loved ones are killed, though.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›