Warhammer 40k

3812 readers

3 users here now

A community dedicated to the universe of Warhammer 40k, a tabletop setting in the far, distant future.

This is a general community for 40k miniatures, art, lore discussion, and gameplay discussion.

Rules

Keep it civil.
No memeposts/shitposts. Memes are great but direct them to grimdank.
Please mark any posts containing realistic nudity or realistic excessive gore/violence as NSFW; this rule mainly applies to cosplay and realistic drawings rather than miniatures. Being that 40k is inherently violent, this is a judgement call, and mods may occasionally request posters add tags.
No political or social cause agenda pushing.

Helpful Links

Related 40K Communities:

[email protected]

Other tabletop hobby communities:

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Magnus heel turn? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’ve been working my way through The Horus Heresy, The Horus Heresy: Primarchs, and a few different modern series like Cain and Vaults of Terra. I just started A Thousand Sons in HH but have read up to Jagatai Khan in HH:P. I’ve also got a loose sense of modern Inquisition, psykers, and chaos (albeit tainted by Cain’s descriptions in many cases). I read Magnus the Red probably before finishing the opening HH trilogy (mostly because I’ve tried to start HH a few times and have read up to book five before).

I don’t understand what I missed in Magnus the Red and Battle for the Abyss that should have made me realize Magnus would go hard for chaos. Almost immediately when we meet Magnus in Thousand Sons it’s clear he’s going to go too far, he’s too cocky, and he doesn’t respect the warp. Before that, he really seemed like a sympathetic character, misunderstood by fellow Astartes, but in line with the level of warp you see the Imperium use in 40k. I’ve got a few questions.

Did I misread Magnus the Red? Are there chaos signs there?
Should I have not been sympathetic to all the jabs about the Council of Nikea?
Was the hope that Horus placed in Magnus, maybe even Magnus’s visit during his Nurgle thing, a clue I should have recognized?
Am I supposed to like Leman Russ more than Magnus and side with Russ in his distaste? (The whole Canis Helix thing in Leman Russ which I read first confused the fuck out of me when I read the flesh taint scene with Russ in Thousand Sons).

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

1: No, but keep in mind resistance to the Emperor is reasonable. He is not the good guy.

2: Yes. No. Maybe.

3: Kind of, but not really. The hint is that Magnus is a doomed prophet archetype. His warnings will be ignored or bring about the doom itself, etc, but someone without foreknowledge would presumably have thought he was going to be Team Loyalist.

4: No, Leman Russ has fleas.

5: Magnus turns to Chaos to save the Thousand Sons. He embraced Chaos because he loves space magic, and that is something that was denied to him by the Emperor. It doesn't matter that the dangers were real, what matters is the Emperor didn't give him the full story because he's a tyrant who demands obedience and sees the Primarchs as tools first and sons never.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

I really appreciate the Emperor callouts. In 40k he’s way too removed to be anything more than a swear. In 30k so far I’ve only directly seen him in one of the short stories. I don’t have an opinion on him so much as I have opinions on how people are executing his vision. Maybe I’m being too sentimental about the callback when chaos steals all the primarchs somewhere early in the first HH trilogy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

I haven't read the Primarch series myself, but one thing you have to bear in mind is that these are different authors writing the same characters, often years apart. It's not always going to jive perfectly.

Magnus is interesting to me because for the most part he is an unwilling participant on the side of chaos. He submitted himself to servitude because he was cast aside by the "good" guys, and the ruinous powers were the only thing that could save his Sons. My theory is that he did this to bide time and maybe find a better solution one day, but for now he's stuck being the goodest bad guy, so to speak.

Also worth remembering that the primarchs are flaaaawwwed individuals whose actions don't always make sense (blame the quality of writing on that one if you want.) I don't really like Russ because he's kind of a big dumb hypocrite concerning psykers, but at the same time he would go to the ends of the earth for his legion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Closest I've seen for an explanation of this is a duplicity in how he presents himself to those he knows disagree with him versus those he knows do agree with him.

There is also the matter of the eventual sharding of his soul. He may literally have been of two minds here, even if both sides disagreed with the outcome of the Council of Nikea. Its just a question of degree.