this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
-49 points (24.7% liked)

Selfhosted

46685 readers
324 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A while ago, I posted about my plan to build a Lemmy client using the Plebbit protocol.

The response was, honestly, full of hate. I wasn’t expecting praise or anything, but I didn’t think people would react so negatively to the idea of something truly decentralized.

But here I am again. Still believing that Plebbit is the only real self-hosted social media protocol out there.

Let me explain why, in the most direct way I can:

– Plebbit is serverless. – There are no global admins. – It does not rely on any central server. – It can’t be censored or taken down. – It works like BitTorrent, but for social media. – No subreddit can go offline as long as one peer is online.

Every subreddit (called a "subplebbit") is its own world. Mods can ban users, remove posts, or run things how they want. But there’s no “head office.” Nothing above them.

And yes, Plebbit already has support for NSFW subs like /pol and others. It doesn’t need approval from anyone.

I see Plebbit as the Bitcoin of social media. Pure, peer-to-peer. No middlemen. No backdoors. No central kill switch.

It reminds me of what the internet was supposed to be—free, open, uncensorable.

Sadly, most devs I’ve met online don’t really understand peer-to-peer tech deeply. Some barely know cryptography. That’s okay, but it also makes real decentralization hard to appreciate.

If you’ve never read the Plebbit whitepaper,

https://github.com/plebbit/whitepaper

please do. It’s not just another protocol. It’s a whole different way of thinking about social interaction online.

I’m still planning to build that client. I don’t care if the first reactions were negative. I’m not doing this for approval. I’m doing it because I genuinely believe in it. But reviews matter too.

(page 2) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They're not hated. They're very fragmented and confusing for the layman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

If you want to participate in Plebbit, then do that. Have fun. You do you. It shouldn't matter whether anyone here approves or not.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I see Plebbit as the Bitcoin of social media.

I found your problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I'm going to post it again.

For anyone else looking for a reason to stay away from plebbit- uh, look at their X account https://x.com/getplebbit
It’s 4chan crypto hashwash

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I think there's such a knee-jerk reaction to any mention of crypto currency, even in comparison, that even a whiff of a relationship generates negative reactions. As you say, much of it is based on no actual knowledge about the topic. It doesn't help that there are some truly deplorable people associated with cryptocurrency, a great many bad actors, and proof-of-work was in retrospect a terrible design decision by Satoshi.

Blockchain isn't cryptocurrency, and vice-versa, but most people can't distinguish between the two. If there's any mention of blockchain on the site, or especially if you mention bitcoin (as you did) you're going to get crusaders.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (9 children)

My question is... What does this do that ActivityPub and ATProto doesn't do? That's the angle you should approach this from (and be ready to defend... People on Lemmy seem adamant that ActivityPub is perfect and unbeatable...). We're technical people here, sell it as a technical solution to a problem rather than using buzzwords or comparing it to Bitcoin.

You've mentioned serverless many times, but ultimately I need to send content somewhere and ask someone to send me content. I can't just throw my posts into the wind and expect someone else to get them. So how do I make a post if not by sending it to a trusted person?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago

Never heard of plebbit before. Looks interesting!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago

I’m not doing this for approval.

Okay. Go away and do it then.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe because you tried to backdoor a sales pitch into a community where it wasn't quite on topic, and the community members didn't appreciate it?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago

No they made people up that got mad. It’s just sympathy bait. It’s most likely an ad to fake interest in a hopeless project

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Wait until regulations hears about your decentralized social media not regulating CSAM content sharing. Pure decentralization is a libertarian wet dream. We are not into that here.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›