this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
-1 points (0.0% liked)

Firefox

17865 readers
8 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Replies to this thread indicate this is not fully correct as it exists on all browsers; and is likely an ad thing.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don't use the youtube website. On any browser. Use freetube instead, if your situation and use case allows it. No Google bullshit required. Loads fast, no ads, no tracking. Fully self contained.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

I really appreciate you saying "if your situation and use case allows it". I'm sick of people "suggesting" these kind of things by just saying "don't do this" "stop doing that" while completely ignoring that not everyone has the same use cases, preferences and possibilities for such.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Whoever posted this is not a programmer. Does no conditional on that code so it would run on every browser on every session so where's the check for Firefox?

Unless they are claiming that it is injected at runtime. But that's easily provable/disprovable with agent spoofing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

If the person who tweeted this scrolled down in the hackernews thread, they’d see this code was misinterpreted. It’s part of an anti Adblock script that runs 5s after page load. Still shitty, but less insidious

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

It would not be the first time Google was caught doing this. A couple years ago they were caught breaking apps like google maps if your user agent string wasnt chrome.

But recently I've noticed they can tell regardless of that string. So my guess is that they've hidden fingerprinting code in the chrome browser