In keeping with the Siri brand, Apple has to make sure LLM-Siri’s underlying model is bad at everything
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
42 points (93.8% liked)
Apple
17431 readers
132 users here now
Welcome
to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!
Rules:
- No NSFW Content
- No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
- No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread
Communities of Interest:
Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple
Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode
Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I’m hoping this is temporary until they build their own platform.
So Apple's in-house LLM sucks? I was really hoping the big AI update that was promised for iOS18 would be for improving the on-device AI features utilizing the neural processors but I guess it looks like that won't be the case.
Siri already sucks, replacing Siri with Gemini doesn't give me confidence in Apple's AI vision
So we can buy Android now as well?
Well, if your reason was "I use Apple because I don't like Google" then yes. Better work with the real deal than a limited piece of crap that won't allow you to install adblockers and adblocked apps.
If you like the Apple interface and ecosystem better then there's no hope for you.
I have faith that Apple would do this right. Your phone is unlikely to hit Google directly for AI stuff. It would be just another iCloud service.
It’s all about money for Apple. Not about user privacy. They track lots of info from their users as well and even want to sell AppleTV+ subscriptions with advertising!! Ridiculous
The erosion of privacy was always an absolute certainty once Apple started the transition to becoming a service-based company, and why I only choose Linux-compatible cross-platform apps and services for everything essential.
Apple fanboys (or paid guerrilla marketers) have downvoted me every time I point this out, and I'm sure that will continue... indefinitely.
They won't hand much, if any, user data to Google with this deal, but the profit multiplier promised by predictive analytics guarantees the endless march of surveillance capitalism will continue.
So, I have a firm anti-Google stance. I won’t use anything that has their involvement. So, looks like I’m getting a PinePhone.
You’re insane.
No, just hilariously unaware of the PinePhone's limitations - and so is everyone who down voted you.
It was more of a joke. There’s nothing else but iOS at this point.
GrapheneOS also works somewhat.
My favorite quality in a device…
It would be a tempting choice if forced to use Android, but leaving iOS for GrapheneOS (Android) would be a step in the wrong direction.
Actually, GrapheneOS would be a significant step in a better direction, even before Gemini gets added to the iOS equation.
GrapheneOS is Android. And using Android at all is supporting Google. Even if it’s de-googled. Just like using any chromium browser. Although, it does look like a good choice for Android users.
DONT.
Michael Scott: "Don't..."
Anyone got a paywall-free link?
No need. I asked Gemini about the summary from that link and the 3rd answer was satisfying:
Here's a revised summary without favoring any specific AI model:
Bloomberg reports Apple is in discussions with Google to license a generative AI model for potential use in iPhones with iOS 18. This could bring advanced AI functionalities to iPhones, though the specific applications remain unclear. The talks suggest a possible collaboration between Apple and Google in the field of AI for smartphones, which could be significant considering their usual competitive nature.