this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

58144 readers
4471 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SpaceX projected 20 million Starlink users by 2022—it ended up with 1 million::Starlink has a fraction of the projected $12B revenue and 20M users, WSJ says.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My internet where I live is through cable and it's terrible. Bad. Outtages all of the time. Down for days at times. So I switched to starlink. It's fine. Works great EXCEPT WHEN IT RAINS HEAVILY.

Heavy rain blocks the signal. Elon Musk owns it.

Now, I have a t-mobile hotspot. It's only $50 per month as opposed to the $110 for Starlink.

If you have no other decent option, Starlink is amazing. If you have other options, don't give Musk your money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They're about to lose another one. We finally got fiber run to our area, so now I have internet that doesn't zone out every 5 - 10 minutes to find another satellite. Canceling Starlink next week. Fuck you Elon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was hyped when I first learned about starlink, finally I wouldn't be stuck with 1 Mbps from ATT, then my power co-op announced it would be running gig fiber to all customers homes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They haven’t done a great job of marketing it. $100-120 a month isn’t bad and it beats the pants off of all the other satellite internet services.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Private infrastructure owned by that megalomaniac is not good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If there was another option I'd take it. As it is though, I'm travelling around Australia and it's freaking brilliant. Australia has zero coverage for most of the country outside of the towns and city regions. I can park up in total outback with no phone reception and get anywhere from 150 to 400 Mbps. I couldn't do this without it, so I'll take it, as it's the only option