this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
88 points (88.6% liked)

Asklemmy

47238 readers
776 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure pirates knew the answer. Probably fighter pilots as well.

(page 2) 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

It depends on what you mean by "escape", and what you view as the alternative.

I suspect that the pursuer could never converge on the same instantaneous point, given sufficient initial distance (and orientation). At a certain distance, the prey could enter a stable orbit around the pursuer. I don't have a mathematical proof but I strongly suspect this to be the case,and I can envision the structure of a proof.

Could the prey infinitely extend the gap between themselves and the pursuer? No. I don't have the tooling to actually present such a proof, but of that one I am confident.

I think if you introduced concepts of obstacles and a "radius of escape" (where if the gap meets a threshold the predator is permanently foiled), then there are almost certainly scenarios where the prey could escape.

We actually see this scenario play out in nature all the time

load more comments (7 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It can never escape because its turning speed helps nothing while the distance is big, so the pursuing ship can always catch up to it again.
The only reason a fighter pilot has a chance to escape a faster missile is when the missile's targeting system can only see in front of it, so when it overshoots it loses its target.
But with a faster turning speed, the chased ship can evade the pursuer forever, if the captain always turns at the perfect moment.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

I wonder if with missiles it also helps because the missile would eventually run out of fuel which I'd presume a rocket would be burning through quite quickly. Maybe you could also evade a pursuing ship in this manner, although you'd have to hope they didn't have much fuel left to begin with.

load more comments (15 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This sounds right to me. Thank you

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any amount of turn in between 0 and 180 i presume, and the game is "tag" correct? Do they have to be caught from the back, or would a head to head collision count? Does the trailing ship have perfect response time? I don't see how turning around 180 degrees would help evade capture. In summary, no, I think you'll always be tagged by the faster ship.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Too much thinking is beyond me. That's why I'm asking smart people.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ