Lol, no they're not!
Slop.
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
Michael Crichton was a libertarian tho
Who denies climate change too. Thinks because he writes vaguely science-related stuff he's qualified to dispute the conclusive findings of thousands of scientists in their field and dozens of world-wide scientific bodies.
it's funny, he apparently went to medical school, so it seems like he's cursed with having JUUUUST enough knowledge but not enough to know he doesnt know anything.
I was going to say. Entertaining writer, I enjoyed his work. But I don’t recall this motherfucker ever deliberately injecting a materialist perspective into his work
Yeah, I'm a Marxist-Lenenist-Tyrranosaurist
If I’m only a tyranosaurist what color is my political compass square?
@gork is this true
I'm glad someone said it. I tried watching the new Jurassic Park films and not a single dinosaur had a penis. The best part of the original film was comparing the penis stats and woke ruined that.
woke needs to go one step further and have penises only on girl dinosaurs
the transasaurus-rex will reign supreme in woke jurassic park
I just want proud heterosexual dinosaurs worshiping god and comparing their penises in the swamp.
That's already a plot point in Jurassic Park
Embryonic leftism and its a novel by a climate change denier 😭
As fun as Jurassic Park and in fact most of Crichton's books are, it's still basically "the manly maverick cowboy chad paleontologist owns the cringe woke soy corporate IT guys with facts and logic and a flamethrower."
Though at least Hammond was treated with the contempt he deserved.
There is only one Hammond in Sci Fi that gets my respect. Hammond...of Texas.
The part of Stargate which requires the greatest suspension of disbelief is that they're in the USAF.
I'm hamming it up a bit, but there are some good things to it. Like that, and the cynicism towards corporate bullshit in general. Crichton had brainworms, but they were more that specific libertarian sort that's distrustful towards any sort of institution or power figure including corporations and rich people.
It feels like all his books really followed that one formula of some kind of manly maverick nerd consulting on some kind of corporate/government project run by soy conformist nerds who make dumb mistakes like not counting dinosaurs good or letting the nanobots do data storage and the manly maverick nerd instantly sees through them and saves the day, though.
Reactionaries are all-or-nothing sorts. If you aren't literally sieg heiling then you're part of the woke DEI liberal communist conspiracy.
And they’re always the same smuglords who say about how dumb people can’t understand generalizations.
Please tell me if this hypothesis is real, but these types are idiot children playing dress up in the “mysterious hacker known as 4chan’s” legacy. They’re more interested in looking like cyber gangsters and aren’t actually all powerful dangerous superhumans like they carry themselves as.
Unless the reactionaries like you, then you are playing 4D chess against the :LIB: checkers.