Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
Alt text: Trojan Horse meme, Steam Deck bringing Linux to Windows gamers
It's true! Since getting a steamdeck I have tried 1) SteamOS (obviously), 2) Mint Cinnamon, and 3) Elementary. I run my plex server on a Beelink running Elementary, Mint I've left because I'm coming from MacOS and don't necessarily want a Windows experience, but it was solid!
Building a computer now and planning on running Bazzite exclusively on it :)
I've loved using Linux on my steamdeck to game, but sadly I cant really switch because of lossless scaling. LSFG is too good to stop using, and there's no Linux equivalent. not even afmf2 works on linux
Use whatever you want
Don't let the Linux fans try to tell you that Linux is this amazing thing that can fix all your problems.
It is amazing, but it doesn't mean it's amazing at everything. You don't need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Gamescope is technically lossless scaling without the framegen. Technically it should be possible to add to gamescope.
yes, but lossless scaling is closed source and the developer has decided not to try adding Linux support. supposedly its because of it's reliance on windows capture apis
there are many games i play that dont work on Linux systems
Which ones, genuinely curious?
Pretty much every online competitive game cuz they all use invasive anti cheats and scapegoat linux as the cheater platform.
CS2 is the only outlier that I know of (VAC is server side mostly & CS2 is native anyways so). Probably some other games that are linux friendly too, but 99% are not.
CS2 FaceIT, Tarkov, CoD, Le Mans Ultimate
I'll start with Fortnite. Hate on it if you want but my kids and wife play it and I enjoy playing with them even if I don't much care for it myself.
Maybe switch to Linux so you can't play Fortnite
Kernel level anti cheat is such crap.
Windows user here.
Idgaf as long as it works and isn't shit. If it has lots of cool clever stuff, all the better.
Most vendor software works the best on Windows.
Windows also generally has the best compatibility. I always keep at least one Windows 11 VM to install various things in.
Have you run some demanding games in that VM? And what virtualisation have you been using?
I've been thinking about trying that out with QEMU/KVM.
Windows is shit tho. Has been for a long time now.
I'm a power user, I don't even want to upgrade or have to reinstall because of how much shit I've gone through to get it to this point. Easily a decade old install and very active use. I would lose so much random stuff if I ever had to upgrade or switch. Windows is shit and Microsoft are total bastards for that, there's no denying it. But for me, it is not so simple as one being better or worse. Maybe if I were in a stage to switch I'd consider it, but still windows is not without its own offerings/positives.
Slowly switching may be an option for you. You could always dual boot a Linux distro alongside your current Windows install.
Then once you have Linux running with all your apps, etc, you can see what you're missing from your Windows install and if you can move stuff over, etc.
You could even try it in a VM, see if you can set it up in a VM to how you like first before doing the whole install, may or may not be a bit easier (easier in the sense that you can directly compare whatever you do on Windows with the Linux install in a vm).
Why would they want to switch to Linux if Windows works for them?
It takes a lot of effort
They don't have to, I was simply providing a solution to a problem they don't have.
If they want to, but can't because of they decade old configurations, this solution could ease the process or allow them to figure out if it's even a possibility.
Basically just letting them know they can try it without destructing their existing Windows setup.
If your OS is so brittle that you can't upgrade it without "losing so much random stuff," you're not standing on solid ground, and I'd argue "it doesn't work properly either. You're basically balancing on a house of cards that, and eventually it will fall, and it won't be pretty. Do yourself a favour and switch to a more future-proof solution, now that you still have proper access to your data. Future you will most likely thank yourself.
If you have a 10 year old Linux intall you wouldn't want that to go away either. That has nothing to do with the OS.
Stop being so "aggressive" against people's and let them have their own opinion. It is not helping to get others to get to Linux. What does help is to show people how it can be done.
But no one keeps a 10 year Linux install when upgrading is a trivial command. That's the whole point.
Also, this is advice you're already being given for free, no one here cares if you stay on Windows or not. No one is going to help you more than that.
The first mistake is not keeping your 10 year old installation updated
There a Debian installs that are like 20 years old. They have been continuously updated over time.
An old install doesn't mean no updates
Thatβs not even a discussion if it was or wasnβt update
Doesn't it run on Arch? Crazy to think there's a bunch of Arch users that don't say they use arch btw
It isn't true Arch though, so the Arch forums would never accept them. They would have to go install from scratch to be able to get "I use arch btw" badge.
I use endeavouros btw.
I use Stearch btw
I eat starch btw