this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
1044 points (99.0% liked)

pics

19745 readers
54 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

Silly Canada. You’re not suppose to say that you put up the billboard. You’re suppose to run it through a various political organizations like “Americans For a Better Future” or American Families for Prosperity“.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I get what they're saying but I think the "Paid for by the government of canada" might be misinterpreted...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm all for proper attribution, but I think making it just a little smaller, or two lines so it doesn't line up with the main message, could have made it more clear that it wasn't part of the message.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I think it is part of the message, Canada was pushing back against the tariffs USA was imposing.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I know it took me half a second. Adding "poster" in front, or something would make in unambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

"the only thing the government of Canada is paying for is this ad"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These Tariffs are not approved by Congress, so they are taxation without representation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s not quite what that phrase means, but I like the spirits

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's approaching that point.

If the executive ignores the law and the other branches of government, we effectively no longer have a representative government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yes. This is pretty much the spirt of it.

The founding fathers probably could not have predicted some idiot MFer ping-ponging tariffs on and off so him and his buddies could do some insider trading and destroy the economy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are these billboards in the USA or Canada?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're at least in one US state because I've seen it while driving down the road.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently these are real, but many have rotated out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The Republican when they see this: "yeah but JJOOOEEEEE BIIIDEN!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Joe Biden immediately tanked the economy to enrich himself and his cronies!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"The 'elites' are driving stock prices down to make Trump look bad. He's being blamed for Democrat fraud" or something along those lines.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

The response I have seen now is “but national debt”

…Has anyone looked at the budget?

load more comments
view more: next ›