this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
44 points (97.8% liked)

Australia

3588 readers
118 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure if we keep voting for the Libor and Laberal parties they will eventually fix it right?

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

How come spending $368,000,000,0000 on nuclear submarines that won't arrive until 2050, and most likely won't be useful in 2050 because they will most likely be detectable, for a war that will never happen, is a good use of taxpayer funds but spending much less than that on housing is?

They don't even need to spend on housing, they just need to take a risk and kill the housing market, maybe pay off people's mortgages.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Definitely keep bringing in 300k people a year, while building fewer dwellings than the existing population require, and definitely continue incentivising them to be built either a) where nobody wants to live or b) of such a low quality you're forced to take option a.

All guaranteed to improve housing affordability and security for decades and decades and decades and decades.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

This just seems like a thinly veiled attack on immigration honestly. I’d way rather see reforms on absentee foreign ownership of residential property, on Australian owners with more than one property leaving any vacant, and on negative gearing.

There were also 300k babies born in 2022, didn’t hear you say people should stop having kids.

Edit: As well, 220k people migrated away from Australia and 190k people died. It’s really easy to make one number seem like the problem, but there’s a bigger picture you’re omitting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


"It's challenging and I think 0.3 per cent (vacancy rate), that's needle in a haystack type stuff," chief of research and economics at Domain Nicola Powell said.

Ms Powell said record low vacancy rates are being driven by ongoing factors like rapid population growth and rising property prices, leaving more renters stuck in the rental market.

But perhaps the biggest problem is a shortage of supply, and that sluggishness has been brought into sharp focus by the latest Bureau of Statistics building approvals data.

CoreLogic's head of research Tim Lawless said the problem is construction companies are reluctant to build because they can't turn a profit.

And for those hopeful renters looking for at least something to cling onto, Domain data shows, on a national scale, the average views per rental listing continued to decrease in February.

While it may mean that Australians are sleeping rough, on the flip side, Ms Powell said others are choosing to stay at home to save up for a house of their own.


The original article contains 699 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!