Everyone is boomering about the damn kids these days and their phones, but this seems like a cool extra bit accessibility that happens to help people on their phones.
Casual Conversation
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
Do crosswalks literally have marks on the ground now for people who don't look up from their phones?
This just makes me sad.
The entirety of it. The fact it needs to be invented and installed but what's worse is that this person thinks it's a good idea.
It's very concerning.
Like, I'd be fine if this was helpful to people with disabilities, but I have no idea how this would help anyone
The last thing I want to focus my attention on when I'm in traffic is my phone screen.
Everyone needs to be dropped in a place with no internet for 6 months.
Problem solved.
Drop them there with shovels tho, cuz there will be a lot of dead bodies of people who starved when they couldn't order food. Actually the shovels would only be necessarily for a short time, as a ton of them would be left lying around next to the bodies.
Hah, fair point. How about "Dropped in a place with a functional society and no internet, that, yea, magically exists somewhere."?
In that case I would take my modern device with me that's loaded up with gigabytes of music from the last hundred years, and amaze some king or queen with my magic.
Someone's been reading comments on the zapped back in time post.
Says the guy with 1386 comments on his own instance of a fringe social media software :D
Yup, that's me. But I also put it away regularly to experience everything else the world has to offer. Sometimes for pretty extended periods of time, too. And you know, not walk out into traffic.
Do your crossings not make noise? When ours (south Australia) is ready to cross it's very noisy and obvious
Peeeeeeeewdududududududududududuh
I use to live next to a silent crossing and it threw me every time, despite crossing it twice every week day for years
Fun fact that you probably know: the background ‘ticking’ in the chorus of Bad Guy by Billie Eilish is the sound made by traffic lights in Sydney
I did not know that. That's pretty neat; thank you for sharing!
Nppe
I like to look around at the cars going by, examine the infrastructure around the intersection like the nerd I am, and when the countdown starts (the crosswalk signals usually have a countdown until they switch to "GO") I'm looking back and forth between the signal and traffic to see who's stopping and who's trying to beat the light.
I'm not about to trust my life to a signal when so many drivers are too busy on their phones to notice the big lights in front of them shining a different color than it did a second ago.
Finland had a solution for this long before smartphones even existed. Pedestrian traffic lights here play different tones depending on whether it’s red or green, allowing blind or visually impaired people to safely navigate the city.
And one city (Pori) has fricking LASERS projecting a red line on the path when the light is red
Yeah, bringing more accessibility is very good even if it is quite annoying if you live nearby I guess.
In Scandinavia the boxes have microphones and listens to the ambient sound and lowered and raises its sound accordingly. Some even detect humans around it so if noone are around they turn barely audible. Really nice design.
In your country there isn't a sound for when you can cross?
Sadly no. Actually there is a button sometimes, but I couldn't figure what it is for. It's not for blind people because it doesn't make a sound.
What do the visually impaired do?
I've been living here for 4 years and basically never seen any disabled people. Perhaps one or two wheel chairs but otherwise nobody. Same with all the parking spots for disabled, they are all empty all the times.
From what I gather disabled people are mostly kept inside. From https://www.goisc.org/englishblog/2022/5/12/the-struggle-never-ends-the-apr-20-protests-against-disability-discrimination
In Korea, it seems people with disabilities only exist on April 20. Only on this day do politicians flock to the official ceremony to display their concern as famous singers perform on stage; as awards are handed to those who “overcame” their disability and are living like non-disabled people; and as stories of “normal people” who “helped” the disabled touch the hearts of many. However, once the day is over, people with disabilities are forgotten once again, and business goes on as usual, centered on non-disabled people. Disabled people who cannot “overcome” their disability and live like non-disabled people find themselves unable to travel freely, get education, or get work as before. Even worse, they might be confined to their homes or to facilities for the disabled under the pretense of “protection” just awaiting their deaths.
That's incredibly depressing.