Mander

491 readers

2 users here now

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Blocking exploding-heads (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It has blatant homophobia, transphobia, racism, vaccine anti-science misinformation, etc. What is mander stand on this?

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I prefer to deal with content in a case-by-case basis, and de-federation from an instance would be the very last-resort strategy. I want users to have the freedom to choose what they interact with. Today it's exploding-heads, soon it will be Meta, then some might want to defederate from lemmygrad, and after that something else.

My position is to resist de-federation. To defederate I would need to have seen that the users asking for defederation have made an effort not to engage with the content by blocking communities and reporting offending users/content who post to our communities, and the scale of the problem must be so significant that I can no longer deal with it manually. As of today, I have received zero reports of exploding-heads.

I have looked at the communities, and I can see that we have fetched content from the following communities:

[email protected]

It is only five communities, and my suggestion is to block them if you find their content offensive. I hope that users will soon be able to block instances themselves.

If this is a deal-breaker, defederating with problematic instances is a very common position in the fediverse, and it will be easy to find an instance that blocks them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It may not be wise to wait and watch with this one. Part of the reason people are leaving Reddit like myself is we do not want to deal with this anymore. These do not argue in good faith. They will eventually brigade us with the next controversy. I suggest asking your users and listening on this one. This is not a safe place unless defended, that sometimes means being proactive. Consider this my report as well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It may not be wise to wait and watch with this one.

Oh, it is probably not wise if it is my idea.

I am sorry that we are not aligned in this - especially considering that you are literally the most active user here at the moment!

Part of the reason people are leaving Reddit like myself is we do not want to deal with this anymore.

Maybe it is in part our difference in experiences that give us different opinions. I am aware that people are mean online, but I have never been the target of an attack, nor have I experienced the meanness of the internet like others have. So I am definitely not be the best to administrate a vulnerable community.

I left Reddit and other social media a while ago but for different reasons. I left because I do not think that centralized parties should have the authority of dictating how we communicate with each other, to establish what is true and what what isn't, they shouldn't be able to take advantage of our reliance on technology to apply social punishment, and I do not like that they hold our private information. I tell you this because it may provide some insight into why our vision and priorities are not aligned - not because I want to argue this.

But all of these are important. The way I see it: I want to try out an experiment in which I am able to have a reasonably safe space without needing to cut off connections. And yes, maybe this is a naive view that assumes too good of the people, but I want to try.

They will eventually brigade us with the next controversy. I suggest asking your users and listening on this one.

But why is there no hope of stopping this? I feel like these issues can happen even within the instance, without need for federation, and that they can be dealt with in a few minutes. This is a very small instance, I've never dealt with something like this. I don't know that we ever will... To me these sound like hypothetical problems that may not be so hard to solve when it comes to it, and so I am not very deterred by those possibilities. I genuinely think that... we can handle this.

This is not a safe place unless defended, that sometimes means being proactive.

It is a balance, but it is clear to me now that for many people that balance lies strongly along the 'ensuring a safe-space' axis, and that people are willing to have an authority to sanitize the space if that means minimizing the risk. I am sorry if my choice of waiting until the waves hits the shore makes you feel unsafe here... While I am willing to change, it would take time. Towards the end of another comment[1] I extended an invitation to any user who would like to set up an science-based instance with more stringent federation moderation. I know you are good with technology, and I can already see that you would be a better community admin than I can, so if you would like to take on that offer I would be more than happy!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Once extremists fixate on a target they do not stop. I've watched it be done to others. I've had to ban people across multiple subreddits because they go to scream anywhere they can and then into my inbox on multiple accounts. It's not good faith behavior. Simply blocking after the fact does not stop it. They find other ways once they have a mission. It's easier and healthier to stop it before it's an issue. It's not so easy as it sounds. It'll persist for as long as they are fixated which is not sane or rational. If it's let in, it changes the culture of the instance inherently.

You should be the bartender here: https://www.boredpanda.com/bar-bartender-nazi-punk-iamragesparkle/

The people that have been exposed to the meanness of the internet are trying to warn you about something. Please consider it.