I do not know about shrinkflation, but they have reduced the amount of plastic by x% in the smaller product which is one thing that is very popular these days, and it's weird that there is not a big sticker advertising it.
Shrinkflation
A community about companies who sneakily adjust their product instead of the price in the hopes that consumers won't notice.
We notice. We feel ripped off. Let's call out those products so we can shop better.
What is Shrinkflation?
Shrinkflation is a term often coined to refer to a product reducing in size or quality while the price remains the same or increases.
Companies will often claim that this is necessary due to inflation, although this is rarely the case. Over the course of the pandemic, they have learned that they can mark up inelastic goods, which are goods with an intangible demand, such as food, as much as they want, and consumers will have no choice but to purchase it anyway because they are necessities.
From Wikipedia:
In economics, shrinkflation, also known as the grocery shrink ray, deflation, or package downsizing, is the process of items shrinking in size or quantity, or even sometimes reformulating or reducing quality, while their prices remain the same or increase. The word is a portmanteau of the words shrink and inflation.
[...]
Consumer advocates are critical of shrinkflation because it has the effect of reducing product value by "stealth". The reduction in pack size is sufficiently small as not to be immediately obvious to regular consumers. An unchanged price means that consumers are not alerted to the higher unit price. The practice adversely affects consumers' ability to make informed buying choices. Consumers have been found to be deterred more by rises in prices than by reductions in pack sizes. Suppliers and retailers have been called upon to be upfront with customers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrinkflation
Community Rules
- Posts must be about shrinkflation, skimpflation or another related topic where a company has reduced their offering without reducing the price.
- The product must be a household item. No cars, industrial equipment, etc.
- You must provide a comparison between the old and new products, what changed and evidence of that change. If possible, also provide the prices and their currency, as well as purchase dates.
- Meta posts are allowed, but must be tagged using the [META] prefix
n.b.: for moderation purposes, only posts in English or in French are accepted.##
Did you drop the /s? Because that's not how that works. The bigger the container the better the volume to packaging ratio
I know that's not how it technically works, but nowadays a lot of companies introduce smaller bottles at the same price as before, claiming they're reducing plastic use by X%. What they don’t mention is that you’re still paying the same price for less product. So while a bigger container might be more efficient in terms of packaging-to-volume ratio, that logic often gets tossed out when marketing wants to spin "less for the same" as an eco-friendly move.
Can't speak about if shrinflation or not, but these measures bug me out. Where can u buy such weird things? Canada? 89 and 59ml..are all your products so weird or is this due to conversion for your more measurly challenged southern neighbors?
Conversion from fl oz :(
The same plastic container is used on both sides of the border.
TIL. Thanks. And my condolences
Did they remove the 89ml version entirely or did the price go up on both? I can find both the 89ml and 59ml versions of this product online, so it doesn't seem like it has been replaced by one for the other.
In my experience, shrinkflation has more to do with trying to hide the missing amount, while there is no hiding this at all.
Like when all my bars of soap stopped being cube shaped and started having a rounded bit shaved out of the bottom 16 years ago. It was done to keep an appearance of the same general shape and size while cutting a significant amount of soap out from each bar.
I would expect real shrinkflation to include the 89ml version no longer existing (as I said, I still see 89ml versions) and to be packaged into a new bottle with a different shape to hide the difference.
This seems more of an example of just a general price increase without any attempt to hide the price increase, which at the very least is more honest.