this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
331 points (96.1% liked)

AskUSA

516 readers
3 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. [email protected] - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. [email protected] - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. [email protected]
  2. [email protected]
  3. [email protected]
  4. [email protected]
  5. [email protected]

Related communities

  1. [email protected]
  2. [email protected]
  3. [email protected]
  4. [email protected]
  5. [email protected]

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Banned is maybe too far, but why should we as a country allow people to have petty power over meaningless things their neighbors do? Could we ban HOAs from being included in house sales, and every time it's sold the new owners have to opt in?

For the most part, I'm wondering about this in the context of single family homes since for homes like condos, you could make the case that HOAs are useful for shared things like roofs and whatnot. Maybe limit mandatory HOA involvement to things like what's truly necessary and shared and not how tall your grass is?

(page 4) 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago

Could we ban HOAs from being included in house sales, and every time it’s sold the new owners have to opt in?

This is a really good suggestion.

Maybe limit mandatory HOA involvement to things like what’s truly necessary and shared and not how tall your grass is?

A shared maintenance cost for very specific things like the community center, garbage pick-up, the roads, etc., is a great idea.

They've just figured out a way to be racist and get rid of neighbors they don't like. They should be remade at the very least.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I won't live in an HOA. But that being said, I don't really have an issue with other people wanting to live in an HOA.

However, I do not like the fact that the HOA has permanent authority over any property you purchase inside of its zone.

I feel like there should be a specific and reasonable amount of money that you can pay in order to exempt your home from the HOA permanently, a method to break the HOA contract at least for as long as you live there.

Like maybe the HOA could reinstate the contract once you move out, and the next owner would have to break it again, but at least while you're living there, you should be able to be exempt from them if you so choose.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And also, I feel like there should be a governmental body that HOAs are responsible to that can handle mediation and give you a higher authority to appeal to.

I've heard horror stories of HLA presidents coming into people's houses to make sure that they've emptied their trash appropriately and other weird stuff like that should have a method of redress that does not necessarily involve a protracted legal battle.

Some sort of HOA governance that is nationwide with state and county chapters would massively lower my resistance to HOA's and give them a little bit more legitimacy in my opinion.

They should have to clearly establish their bylaws and submit them to the governance body and have them approved, and then they should only be allowed to exercise the bylaws that have been agreed upon by the community.

No more weird old people sitting out in your front yard, measuring your grass with a ruler and stuff like that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Disclaimer: I'm very anti-HOA. But I do think the case could be made for them in high-density housing like apartment buildings and condos.

Single family homes, though, no. When I was house shopping, I removed any that were part of an HOA from my search. I'm not saying there are no "good" HOAs, but I've heard too many horror stories, and good HOAs can become bad HOAs over time, and your only recourse is to move. No thanks.

I don't think they should be banned, per se, they definitely need reigned in as far as what they can mandate and an opt-out mechanism. I'm not sure how the latter would work if there's things like street maintenance, etc that's part of it, but I'm sure some solution could be found.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Wouldn't things like street maintenance be handled by the city? If they aren't currently and HOAs got banned, it seems like cities could step in and take over without much fuss.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

I was thinking like gated community type areas which are treated more like private property. And in that example, I meant more like if one house opted out of the HOA, but the HOA was still there, then they'd be using the roads without contributing to maintenance.

But yeah, assuming the HOA dissolved, I would imagine the city or county would take over.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›