Been seeing a lot of very confident posts from artist that the world doesn’t need machines with this complexity. Which is kind of funny coming from a crowd who generally couldn’t do complex math by hand if their life depended on it.
196
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
Reminds me of Demi Lardnder and Tom Husband discussing the video of a man reviewing a duck sucking machine
Fucking auto spell I’ll post a link if I find it
https://overcast.fm/+AAyiZEe9z9U
Podcast is called bigsofttitty.png episode 309 overly squeaky…
To me the worse thing is, my collage uses ai to make the tests, I can see it's made by it because of multiple correct options, and in a group the teacher said something like "why lost 1h to make when ai can make it in seconds"
I like to use ai to "convert" citations, like APA to ABNT, I'm lazy for it and it's just moving the position of the words so yeah
Had it write some simple shader yesterday cause I have no idea how those work. It told me about how to use the mix and step functions to optimize for GPUs, then promptly added some errors I had to find myself. Actually not that bad cause now after fixing it I do understand the code. Very educational.
I wonder if "pete" drew those sad faces himself or if they were computer generated.
they were made by a designer, no?
I don't need Chat GPT to fuck my wife but if I had one and her and Chat GPT were into it then I would like to watch Chat GPT fuck my wife.
People are constantly getting upset about new technologies. It's a good thing they're too inept to stop these technologies.
isn't that comic gas company propaganda, or am i rememberong it wrong
Those fools do not realize that creating the torment nexus is just the same as inventing the wheel!
I am very smart!
?
You're not going to find any disciples of Schumpeter in this thread, I'm afraid.
People are also always using one example to illustrate another, also known as a false injunction.
There is no rule that states all technology must be considered safe.
Every technology is a tool - both safe and unsafe depending on the user.
Nuclear technology can be used to kill every human on earth. It can also be used to provide power and warmth for every human.
AI is no different. It can be used for good or evil. It all depends on the people. Vilifying the tool itself is a fool's argument that has been used since the days of the printing press.
Been this way since the harnessing of fire or the building of the wheel.
Joke on you, my wife and I are into it!
It's such a weird question. Why would I need ChatGPT to fuck my wife when we have the Dildoninator 9000 with Vac-u-loc attachments and King fu grip?