this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
542 points (78.2% liked)

Comic Strips

16718 readers
1704 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
542
Safe professions (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Thanks to @[email protected] for finding the original author:

https://www.instagram.com/linhadotrem/

(page 6) 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

As an automechanic, my job will never replace by AI, but instead we're fucked by low wages and the black box automobile has slowly become.

[–] [email protected] 261 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Automation and job replacement is a good thing. The reason it feels bad is because we've tied the ability to satisfy our basic needs to employment. In an economic model that actually isn't a dystopian hellscape, robots replacing jobs is something to celebrate.

And to switch our economic model to one in which a person can thrive without pissing the vast majority of our lives away on the grind; we just need to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps!

[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is so important.

An aspect of post scarcity is that people shouldn't have to work. AGI might allow that; LLM is starting to fill some niches.

The problem is how it's being done. Rather than benefiting society as a whole, it's enriching a few. In an ideal world, people whose jobs are replaced should get a stipend. We should all be eagerly awaiting that time when our jobs are replaced and we get a paycheck - maybe a little reduced - but now we're free to pursue our interests. If that means doing your old job, only now it's bespoke, artisan work, great.

The other missing factors are free energy and limitless resources; but we're making progress on energy, but resources are an issue with no solution on the horizon. Plus, we're killing the planet by just existing, so there's that.

We have a lot of problems to solve but AI is part of the solution, except that it's being done wrong. And expensively.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We have a lot of problems to solve but AI is part of the solution, except that it's being done wrong. And expensively.

There's also a conversation to be had about which jobs shouldn't be automated, either because current technology isn't suitable, or because it might never be suitable. And I'd say that pretty much everything that we are calling 'AI' right now falls under that - I'll say that robots are part of the solution, but I don't think 'AI' is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I agree. LLMs are not AGI. But there are some jobs they can do, and a lot of jobs they can assist.

But I think we're still another generation of apparent AI stagnation, maybe another 20-30 years, before someone figures out there next link; and that might be AGI.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Even if AI is, what we have now is mostly A with only the semblance of I. "Real" "AI" is not yet "real."

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (23 children)

but resources are an issue with no solution on the horizon.

We've got tons of resources, and the means the produce more. The problem is that's not going to make some people lots and lots of money, so they don't do it.

Scarcity is not a problem of "can't" right now, it's a problem of "won't".

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 153 points 1 month ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My bet is personal assistant / personal trainer

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

there a whole Black Mirror episode dedicated to the idea of an AI personal assistant. We may not be that far yet, but we're more than halfway there. We've come a long way from Clippy.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe they meant personnel

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago

It's very human.

[–] [email protected] 133 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Came here to say this... Personal?

This strip was made by AI, wasn't it? WASN'T IT??!?!?!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›