this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

2503 readers
3 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Where do I apply as test subject?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

Can't wait for the flood of people telling us why this isn't feasible for men to take and insisting that when a SAFE and 100% EFFECTIVE form is ready they'll surely take it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

I would love it, tbh

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As a man I can assure you that this pill wouldn't be feasable for me to take and I'm better off without it.

~Because I'm snipped~

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

99% effective is nowhere near 100%, perhaps counterintuitively. Sex twice a week for a year and you're probably in deep shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure but its about the same rate as female birth control. also fertilization cant happen every single day of the month, so in your scenario you only gotta worry about 2 to 3 days a month, when you could use condoms if you were really worried about it.

This is a fantastic alternative to the hell hormonal birth control can be for women.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Am a dude on thyroid medications - hormonal impacting drugs and hormone variations are fucking brutal.

I talked with my wife to get off BC and we started using condoms again after my ordeal of getting stable with thyroid meds. I was like why would you take that shit when condoms exist.

For folks saying 99% whatever - like my condom busts up 1 in 50 or so. So might be better odds on a med.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

I used to have the same issue with condoms, but closer to 1 in 3. It might be worth shopping around for condoms with a better fit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Is that any different than the pill or other contraception methods?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The only birth control that is 100% effective is not having sex.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

The only birth control that is 100% effective is having HOT GAY SEX™

Alternatively become a Buddhist monk and hit yourself in the balls until you're infertile, I guess

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Go back to the dark ages already

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Abstinence is not birth control.

That’s like saying the only way to build a house that doesn’t fall down is to not build the house.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It really is, avoiding risk vs mitigating risk. Birth control is summarized as avoiding unwanted pregnancies, not about baby safe sex.

And I'm not saying "don't have sex if you don't want babies" because that's stupid ass argument considering we have so many other options for birth control for you to choose from

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

The only safe way to fly is to not fly.

It’s not birth control.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Vasectomies Vasectomies are close enough

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Now how in the hell is female sterilization not 100%?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Even after tubal litigation it's possible to still get pregnant if the fallopian tubes grow back together or if another tube/path forms. It's somewhat rare (0.5% of women who have had the procedure could get pregnant again)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But the same thing can happen with vasectomies so why isn't it showing anything there?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Vasectomies are a lot easier to double check. A woman released 1 egg a month. A man released a LOT of swimmers every shot. Go in a cup and check for swimmers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn't there a chance vasectomies don't take either?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Guessing it's more female "sterilization"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›