this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
663 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

68306 readers
4543 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Considering the sort of driving issues and code violations I see on a daily basis, the standards for human drivers need raising. The issue is more lax humans than it is amazing robots.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's hard to change humans. It's easy to roll out a firmware update.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Makes sense. There's less automated cars than human drivers. Human drivers have also been around way longer.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They accounted for that in this report. I believe you are a troll.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe you are a troll.

Then you don't know what trolling actually is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay, I'm sorry. Let me clarify how it's easy to account for the kind of bias you're talking about. Simply divide by the population count. So, they divided the waymo crash count by the number of waymos, and the human crash count by the number of humans. This gives the waymo crash rate and the human crash rate. (In reality, it's a bit more complicated, since the human crash rate is calculated independently each year.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Let me clarify further: It was an attempt at humor, and not meant to be taken seriously as you are doing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I live in Phoenix, Arizona and these are all around. Honestly I feel like the future everyone will have Waymo type services and no one will own cars or even need to learn how to drive one. Who needs to worry about car repairs insurance etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I've rode in them a few times, fell asleep even. I trust a Waymo more than most human drivers. Best test of its capabilities I saw was when school let out and the side road was covered in kids and parents and cars in random spots waiting for people. It stayed in the "lane", no lane lines, and calmly navigated forward as people gave it space. I was in the car the whole time. Still there are some issues to be ironed out, but ultimately I don't think I have ever had a bad riding experience.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

As a techno-optimist, I always expected self-driving to quickly become safer than human, at least in relatively controlled situations. However I’m at least as much a pessimist of human nature and the legal system.

Given self-driving vehicles demonstrably safer than human, but not perfect, how can we get beyond humans taking advantage, and massive liability for the remaining accidents?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We always knew good quality self-driving tech would vastly outperform human skill. It's nice to see some decent metrics!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›