is there an archive to the archive? this one isnt working
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
4298 readers
29 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I mean they've done this before... a quick invasion, taking of a treaty port, and a whole lot of opium
Let me see if I get it straight, I have not finished the text yet but I wanna make sure that I'm understanding it right, since I don't understand business speech. But if I got it correctly it says, that those savings do not come from households, so it's either big corporations or the state itself, and they have saved just under the US and EU together, which means, china is spending less on their development, in fact significantly less, and is growing more and more stable than the west. Is that the takeaway of the first part?
Turns out not allowing capitalist theft to run rampant lets one do more with less. Crazy, right?
Absolutely, and I was sure of that, but man, got surprised with how much more you can do with so much less
basically yeah
Look that boggles the mind, like I knew capitalism was ineffective, but golly jee, this is just staggering, like the gap is monstrous, that basically mean China has the world's market by the balls and the US is downright terrified of it
When liberals cry about wanting freedom for us, they actually mean the freedom to be deprived of basic necessities and to be enslaved wholesale by western pigs once again
That's right the freedom for capitalist pigs to plunger, that's the freedom that the west offers.
and shove their crappy mass-produced American "culture" down everybody's throats as a (highly profitable) kind of palliative.
I couldn't look forward more to seeing the superficial and especially the colonized-mentality, white-worshipping, west-idealizing aspects of American cultural hegemony fade away.
According to the IMF, China generated 28 per cent of total global savings in 2023. This is only a little less than the 33 per cent share of the US and EU combined. That is quite extraordinary. It also has several implications. One is that if China were an open market economy, its capital markets would be the biggest in the world. Another is that how these savings are managed is likely to be the most important single determinant of global interest rates and the global balance of payments.
One is that if China were an open market economy, its capital markets would be the biggest in the world.
Damn, this is a sleazy little sneaky line right here.
"If China were more heavily exploited, those savings would be funneled directly into the profits of western corporations instead of just sitting in their bank accounts."