this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
81 points (83.5% liked)

PC Gaming

10460 readers
448 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ever AC since black flag was terrible in my opinion, with the exception of Valhalla, which was a shit AC, but a damn fun brawler. So I don't put a lot of faith into this one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Valhalla was shit too. Raiding a place? Couldn't even kill innocents. Didn't they do any research into vikings? They struck gold with black flag, the rest was all shit and massive bug simulators.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Valhalla combat was very fun. Raiding a place with your viking troop did feel really good.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I got excited after hearing how much people love this one, I usually play every ~5 or so they release and just pick out the best, but sadly the performance was so bad I had to refund it. I have a bit better than the minimum specs on steam (and the minimum specs are a ryzen 5 and gtx 1070, shouldn't this be the standard target?) and ran everything at low, 1080p, and couldn't get past 15fps.

There are better looking games from ~5-10 years ago I can run at 1440p or even 4k 60fps on high settings, I wish game studios would stop trying to go for the most intensive possible graphics effects with how diminished the returns are for it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are you running, I was playing this on my steam deck and it looked really good with a solid 30 fps. I have a B580 in my main pc and have been bumping settings up from medium to a mix of medium high with ambient and specular RT on and I'm still getting 75fps without framegen or upscaling at 1080p. Xess and FG hits 120+. Not bad for a £250 card.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I also play on SteamDeck but it isn’t constant 30 fps at all. Still completely playable without question but I get a lot of drops down to 20 fps as stuff loads in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you playing from an SD card? I get a couple of little drops but no extended issues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yes from a class 10 micro sd card (64 GB model, which is painfully limiting due to shader caches having to be on the ssd)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

players, not sales. big difference

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Mac users are excited too, it came out day one.

Ubisoft themselves admit it didn’t get the optimization work it needs tho, and that they plan to do further updates.

load more comments
view more: next ›