Here's what HN thinks about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39611484
Lots of griping about their current bête noire: "censorship" of output models that obscure the "truths" that LLMs disgorge.
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
Here's what HN thinks about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39611484
Lots of griping about their current bête noire: "censorship" of output models that obscure the "truths" that LLMs disgorge.
I should extract some quotes when I’ve got time, but that thread is particularly bad even for the orange site. on a quick scroll through I saw the top comment defending musk with some “well technically he’s not wrong, OpenAI broke its promises” shit that utterly ignores musk was pushing for those promises to be broken, a fuckton of fash dogwhistles (and “the AI is disappointing because it’s being censored” definitely is one of them), and a fucking stupid argument about communism for some reason
it’s very funny that OpenAI’s being so public with this, cause there’s a bunch of embarrassing shit in there:
The core algorithms we use today have remained largely unchanged from the ~90s
Ow boy.
I did laugh when I read somewhere else that Musk wanted to make openAI a part of tesla because google, the guy is just a weird megalomaniac. Just as when he was about to be taken over by apple but wanted the job of apple CEO. Reminds me of cartoon villain stuff where the villain dismisses the ideas of the underlings and then 'comes up' with them himself.
fucking slatestarcodex posts steering top-level decisions at OpenAI
This makes me feel justified in sneering. Jesus christ the horror. The horror.
I wonder if they're counting on nobody in the mainstream press paying attention or even understanding how that stuff is embarrassing and just going for the zinger.