this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
1067 points (99.3% liked)

Good News Everyone

1427 readers
41 users here now

A place to post good news and prevent doom scrolling!

Rules for now:

  1. posts must link from a reliable news source
  2. no reposts
  3. paywalled articles must be made available
  4. avoid politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I accept millionaires.

I've yet to see moral billionaires.

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yep, I've seen friends reach the seven figure area through steady seven day weeks and some luck picking their trade and finding industrial clients over a period of fifteen to twenty years. I have seen how little they slept and how kids were basically only possible because they were pretty self reliant from age 12 or 13 and helped a lot around the house. I have no idea how a human could possibly create a thousand times that value in their lifetime.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Damn, $200 sounds low, on the other hand 30% is a crazy share. I'm targeting 10-15% at most.

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

German here, 30% of income after taxes was the rule since a few decades, but in reality many people are closer to 50% now. How do you manage 15%?

EDIT: Oh, right, just saw the 8k income. That's C-Level money here.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's a lot but certainly nowhere near C-level.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iii@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait what? Your rent is 10-15% of your income? What's that like in absolute numbers?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Closer to 9% right now, 700 USD vs. 8k income after tax. But I generally don't spend more than 1k regardless, it's a hard limit for me.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

The thought of 700USD for housing just gave me a boner

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rent pricing is what the people should target first. Hard to fight the nutjobs when rent is so expensive

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago

My grandma lived in this trailer park for 40 years until she died. Pretty low overhead.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it was possible to build co-ops of these it'd be what I've been suggesting for like 9 years.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look up "housing cooperative" in your area, there might actually be one, as there's a pretty substantial number of them scattered across many locations. My area has at least 10.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 2 days ago

I have and there aren't any. Regardless they should be the standard, not the exception.

[–] xye@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’m just glad it’s housing for the unhoused. In general, we shouldn’t compromise for any less than a normal standard of living for all. But, in absence of that we can’t wait around while people freeze and OD on the streets. As long as this doesn’t become normalized and is simply a step forward. Which is a very serious concern. But, this is a solution in that it’s a 1 not a 0, which is often how things play out irl - messy, and lots of compromises.

load more comments