this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
81 points (95.5% liked)

Fediverse

32132 readers
519 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
81
Graze for Mastodon – Firefox Extension (addons.mozilla.org)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Has anyone tried it?

Ive been looking for something that can make following on mastodon easier and found this.

I just installed it and I really like the ability to go to any Mastodon site and click "Follow" and not having it re-direct to my personal site.

It doesn't seem to work with GoToSocial at least at the moment, which is unfortunate. Ill have to see if I can "trick" the API by making it think its a mastodon server.

EX: https://social.jaredzimmerman.com/@jaredzimmerman

@[email protected]

Follow button works very well.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Personally, i don't trust giving full access of an account to a seemingly obscure extension, that is not open source.

And clearly the dev has no intention to make it open source. This was the form on me uninstalling it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I mean, I like the extension. But holy hell, what open source did to you?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Aww man....that sucks! I guess thats an uninstall for me.

source: https://faqabout.me/iam/graze/is-graze-open-source-software-4901

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same... it was a cool extension. :( 🫂

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see: https://github.com/rugk/mastodon-simplified-federation that does something similar ...hmmmm

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you! Seems alive enough for me. :^)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't get it to work unfortunately. Going to write up a big report. If anyone gets it working let me know.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Weird, works fine for me. Great UI. Honestly this should just be the default functionality

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I like that the dev is clear in their intentions towards open source atleast lol Working in groups sucks 😂

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, introverts HATE open source.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I respect how up-front it was at least. I mean, i would've prefer at the very least to make it source available to see if it's trustable, but it's his choice, i guess.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wow yikes.. I like the idea of the addon but that attitude is just nuts and uncalled for IMO. NOTE: to clarify I mean the developers response

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The option was also called "not open source / have trust issues" but i mean, no hate against the dev but i see no reason to trust it off the bat. Yeah, the response was kind of immature.

I get open source can be stressful. for example, the summit dev not making it open since they don't want to deal with PRs/issues but at the very least make it source-available. From my POV this is a cool extension that popped out of nowhere, it's risky to trust that.

I respect the up-frontness, though.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

PRs and issues are not a mandatory part of opensource.

You can literally bundle your code and serve it on some random page on a blog and it would be considered opensource.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh TIL, thank you. Makes it (the decision) make even less sense, now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Lately the definition has become a bit blurred though. Like how some people only consider something "open source" if it also has a copyleft license.