this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

jet's interesting finds

55 readers
1 users here now

my journal

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

References

zbib.org/37315fd951f3402c8baaba6f64076fe7

Anarkulova, A., Cederburg, S., & O’Doherty, M. S. (2021). Long-horizon losses in stocks, bonds, and bills. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3964908

Anarkulova, A., Cederburg, S., & O’Doherty, M. S. (2023). Beyond the status quo: A critical assessment of lifecycle investment advice. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4590406

Anarkulova, A., Cederburg, S., O’Doherty, M. S., & Sias, R. (2025). The safe withdrawal rate: Evidence from a broad sample of developed markets. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747225000010

Estrada, J. (2016). The retirement glidepath: An international perspective. The Journal of Investing, 25(2), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2016.25.2.028

Estrada, J. (2019). The bucket approach for retirement: A suboptimal behavioral trick? . The Journal of Investing, 28(5), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2019.1.093

Merton, R. C. (1969). Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51(3), 247. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926560

Learn about amortization based spending from economist Ben Mathew on the Rational Reminder podcast: The Lifecycle Model vs. Safe Withdrawal Rates (SWR) - youtube.com/watch?v=-2Ul4bdHkXE

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I do use the bucket approach to cover yearly expenses.

Portfolios are variable, trying to force constant returns from a variable asset can cause problems.