this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
125 points (95.6% liked)

Privacy

37976 readers
472 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been looking to switch from gmail to a different email provider that's more private. I've been hearing about Tuta, are there any drawbacks to it? Are there better options?

For a while I was planning on making the switch to protonmail but that's off the table now due to the recent events surrounding them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePooDragon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I didn't like that Tuta didn't support IMAP which means I am locked in to using their client. I self host my own CalDAV and carddav servers for calendar and contacts and wanted a single client for mail/calendar/contacts. Without IMAP support I could not do that. I ended up going with fastmail and am okay with the privacy tradeoff of no end to end encryption.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've been using it for a few months now. Works just fine, doesn't do anything fancy but it doesn't need to. Filter rule creation is pretty limited, and the desktop client doesn't play well with my VPN for some reason, but otherwise it works fine.

[–] serendipity@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago

If you don’t want to run your own mail server then there will always be a trade off somewhere. That trade off could be high costs to pay a tech firm to run a private mail server for you, could be lack of features, could be privacy, could be a lot of things. Even with your own mail server there will be trade offs around security etc. depending upon your skillset.

Personally, I have a hybrid approach.

  • Business is on a mail server
  • Personal with sensitive data (health, bills, etc.) is on a mail server
  • Personal - subscriptions, newsletters, etc. is on Proton
  • Everything else is on Gmail

I also have other accounts (e.g. DDG, Apple Mail, for specific use cases, but I forward the content I receive there into Gmail.

I’ve had a look at Tuta and haven’t seen enough to convince me to move anything there. I’m not going to move my mail servers to a cloud provider, Gmail is there because the address is 20 years’ old and I can’t be bothered updating everywhere that it’s used, and Proton has been great for years, has grown well, and has a corporate mission that I agree with. DDG, Apple Mail etc. is what the internet sees of me - They generate unique email addresses and then I forward the content I want into Gmail, or sometimes Proton.

[–] eight_byte@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

I am very happy with Proton.

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What did proton do wrong? Legit question, I'm out of the loop.

[–] anonymous@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nothing. It's just FUD.

Here's an article about it: https://medium.com/@ovenplayer/does-proton-really-support-trump-a-deeper-analysis-and-surprising-findings-aed4fee4305e

Even if the CEO did support the orange turd, I would personally still be able to separate his personal opinion from what the non profit is doing.

[–] ycnz@lemmy.nz 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He explicitly supported the republican party in its current guise. That's enough for me to run. Fastmail is where I've temporarily landed - would prefer somewhere away from Aussie jurisdiction, but it felt like the least-shit.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 2 months ago

Great source, thanks :)

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That was informative, thanks.

I agree with you, I would be extremely surprised if the Proton CEO supported Trump.. I would say very unlikely.

[–] feoh@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not Tuta but I adore Fastmail.

No BS. No gimmicks. Just privacy aware, protocol conformant E-mail at a reasonable price.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

5€/month for email? 😵

[–] feoh@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Services cost money to run. Either you pay for the product or you are the product.

Make your choice, name your poison. No skin off my nose in any case :)

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean I self host for 4€/month and I could fit multiple emails in there

Email is pretty much just about storage at some point, and there are a lot more cost effective servers for this, than a simple VPS

[–] feoh@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Self hosting email is a non trivial effort. I've done it before and am in zero rush to do it again.

And before you tell me "Oh hey I've had no problems at all with delivery getting blocked by GOOG or MSFT" good on you but that has NOT been a lot of people's experience trying to self host their E-mail, including mine.

[–] ycnz@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Email's actually quite unpleasant (not hard) to do well. Look sideways at anyone doing it free or super-cheap.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm selfhosting with mailcow and it's great

But I agree, setting it up from scratch is really annoying

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago
[–] scheep@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ve tried tuta before. It seems pretty okay, but it doesn’t support IMAP meaning you have to use their app, and (at least for me) it was SLOW.

I personally use disroot, but there’s loads of other options, like mailfence seems like a decent alternative. Just pick one that supports IMAP

[–] MischievousGT@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm using Tuta and their app for a few years now. The app was slow indeed but it's good now, no problems so far. Lack of IMAP support is justified with security, they say. I personaly don't need IMAP as I'm completely satisfied with the app, which is available officially in f-droid btw.

[–] scheep@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

yk, fair enough. if you like it, that’s fine by me

[–] Termight@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No single organization should be trusted. "Emails paint an intimate narrative of ourselves — the people we talk to, the books we read, the politics we practice. This information is powerful. When we lose control over it, it can do great harm to ourselves and our loved ones." https://ideas.ted.com/why-we-should-all-care-about-encryption-really/

[–] Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What's the practical takeaway here? Just don't have an email basically

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Take control of your data. Host your own email or use a provider that cares about your privacy.

We talk about this so often in privacy communities because, although emails are particularly difficult to secure, they're so important. Swapping your email provider or hosting your own is so easy to say and so hard to do, but so worth doing. I would suggest taking some steps towards FLOSS/FOSS and other privacy-friendly options in other areas first to get used to the idea of change and some of the difficulties you'll handle in that realm

[–] Termight@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

What’s the practical takeaway here? Just don’t have an email basically

@Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com The takeaway here is not "don't use email at all." You can employ OpenPGP, and encrypt your emails. Also, host your own keys. Perhaps don’t allow a single corporation to have your private key and access to your encrypted messages simultaneously.

[–] ethancedwards8@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago

I recommend mailbox.org instead.

[–] confuser@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

I started using fastmail, best thing I decided to do in awhile

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Tuta's product is snake oil.

A cryptosystem is incoherent if its implementation is distributed by the same entity which it purports to secure against.

If you don't care about their (nonstandard, incompatible, and snake oil) end-to-end encryption feature and just want a freemium email provider which (purports to) protect your privacy in other ways, the fact that their flagship feature is snake oil should still be a red flag.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is there anything about Startmail (company that does Startpage.com) that is worth avoiding? I've never paid for mail but if it's solid and avoids Google I might.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

StartPage/StartMail is owned by an adtech company who's website boasts that they "develop & grow our suite of privacy-focused products, and deliver high-intent customers to our advertising partners" 🤔

They have a whitepaper which actually does a good job explaining how end-to-end encryption in a web browser (as Tuta, Protonmail, and others do) can be circumvented by a malicious server:

The malleability of the JavaScript runtime environment means that auditing the future security of a piece of JavaScript code is impossible: The server providing the JavaScript could easily place a backdoor in the code, or the code could be modified at runtime through another script. This requires users to place the same measure of trust in the server providing the JavaScript as they would need to do with server-side handling of cryptography.

However (i am not making this up!) they hilariously use this analysis to justify having implemented server-side OpenPGP instead 🤡

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

Wow, that is very disappointing. I had started using startpage as a Google alternative. While it still may be preferable to Google specifically, their mail product is definitely out.

load more comments