this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
437 points (96.0% liked)

World News

46025 readers
4604 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Canadian quotas? Classic Trump move—complain loudly, ignore the facts.

🐱🐱

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I think he's referring to the production management program we have here in Canada where farms apply for production units (against a quota). Still, he doesn't realize that it has helped at least agriculture products here in Canada remain relatively price stable as compared to other products.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago

"These sky high Tariffs are part of Canada's unfair, long-standing policy to shield domestic producers from foreign competition, especially in Agriculture,"

That's exactly what tariffs are for, yes. What did you think they were for?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

"Only I'm allowed to do shit" complains world's most pampered grandpa

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Trump basically tried to play Rochambeau, said "I go first", kicked himself in the balls, then had Canada and Mexico take their turn, and it's now whining like a little bitch that his tiny balls hurt and saying it's not fair.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Trump is so stupid. He has to be nothing but a distraction for a background political mastermind. How could someone this idiotic have won an election?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Years of carefully curated anti-intellectualism in every bit of media they consume, because facts didn't suit the wealthy (smoking is bad for you, fossil fuels are destroying the planet, private prisons drive more recidivism are facts that get in the way of someone making lots of money). Those fighting facts that aren't on their side have embraced a number of other groups with anti-intellectual elements (white supremecists / neo-nazis / anti-woke, religious, anti-vaxxers, natural health advocates) to create alliances of anti-intellectual thought.

This has driven increasing polarisation in the US; 49% of republicans approved of JFK as president, and 49% of democrats approved of Eisenhower. It went down over time - other party approval was 30% of Carter, 31% of Reagan. There was a break in the pattern (44% for Bush Senior), but back on track to 27% for Clinton, 23% for Bush, 13% for Obama, 7% for Trump (first round), and 6% for Biden. So in other words, Americans are so polarised that they'll vote for whoever their side puts up, and for one side, being anti-intellectual is actually seen as a strength.

I think many of the people who started the anti-intellectualism ball rolling on purpose are wealthy neoliberals who believe in laissez-faire free trade as a fundamental value, and so there is a certain aspect of 'leopards ate my face' to this leading to the anti-intellectualism extending back to rejection of mainstream economics (even though the neoliberals' preferred theory is notoriously flawed, Trump's approach to pulling economic levers is wholesale rejection of all theory rather than replacing it with something less flawed).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The American electorate is mind-blowingly stupid.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Election fraud.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Like, ignoring a trade deal we created? Oh no, that was him. Donnie, if you're going to attack people, you can't get upset when they defend themselves. Maybe you should just take your ball and go home?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I thought he's a master deal maker?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Ignoring a deal he signed!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Not a war crime the first time. Sit down, Donald.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Canada: "I'll fuckin do it again"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

What a petulant fucking child.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

What a fucking baby. You reap what you fucking sow. I'm glad Treadau didn't buy into the games of 'TARRIFF!!!...haha just kidding...TARIFFS AGAIN!!! Nope just kidding again'. It was obviously some stupid tactic to act like he was in control of the situation. Glad they're standing up to him.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Donald Trump does not lose trade wars. He wins them, or he quits because the other side is cheating.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I feel that it's his general philosophy

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Trump: "I challenge you to a fist fight!"

[gets punched]

Trump: "No fair! You cheated!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Trump is basically Cartman from South Park.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

"Not fair! I called tariffs no backsies!"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Idiot fucks around, finds out. More at 11

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

im glad you asked me about playing with my balls, mister trump

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Classic loser response: "you're cheating"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They should rage quit as well

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"mommy, they're mean to me!!!"

I remember Trump rage quitting a NATO summit when Merkel, Trudeau, Macron, Johnson and Rutte were making fun of him during his first term. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/dec/04/trump-describes-trudeau-as-two-faced-over-nato-hot-mic-video

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I meant him rage quitting with a gun

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I hope he takes Vance and Musk with him then. Because him dead means Vance as president, and he's a lot more dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

i think you're giving the man too much credit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Im not sure. Vance lacks the power to command the mobs

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Dude used the word war in a sentence with Canada. And now he's surprised at the result?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm a little surprised they've been so fair actually

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They removed all the California Wine from the shelves. They're already getting creative.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

the cryest of crybullies

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

"Plankton cheated!"

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

Yeah... we're definitely cool with becoming dependent on the US for our food supply.

load more comments
view more: next ›